Contrasting histoarchitecture of calcified leaflets from stenotic bicuspid versus stenotic tricuspid aortic valves

Department of Biomedical Research, St. Elizabeth's Hospital, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02135.

Preliminary findings from clinical trials of percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty and intraoperative debridement of calcific deposits in patients with aortic stenosis have suggested that calcified, congenitally bicuspid aortic valves may be less amenable to these techniques than are calcified tricuspid aortic valves. Accordingly, we evaluated the histoarchitecture of calcific deposits in 30 operatively excised aortic valves. Light microscopic sections taken through the calcified aortic valve leaflets disclosed two principal types of histoarchitecture. In 11 aortic valves nodular calcific deposits were superimposed on an underlying fibrotic aortic valve leaflet (type A); in 17 valves calcific deposits were diffusely distributed throughout the body (spongiosa) of the aortic valve leaflets (type B). Two aortic valves could not be classified histologically. These histologic subtypes were not randomly distributed with regard to gross valvular morphology. All 14 bicuspid valves (100%) were type B; in contrast, 11 (69%) of 16 tricuspid aortic valves were type A, and only 3 (19%) of 16 tricuspid valves were type B (p less than 0.01). Both valves with nonclassifiable histologic features were tricuspid on the basis of gross examination. Thus, the histoarchitectural distribution of calcific deposits is different for bicuspid than for tricuspid stenotic aortic valves. The more diffuse distribution of calcium throughout the body of calcified bicuspid aortic valve leaflets may render these valves less amenable to operative and percutaneous valvuloplasty than are calcified tricuspid aortic valve leaflets on which calcific deposits are typically superimposed in nodular form.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. R. Moreno, L. Astudillo, S. Elmariah, K. R. Purushothaman, M. Purushothaman, P. A. Lento, S. K. Sharma, V. Fuster, and D. H. Adams Increased macrophage infiltration and neovascularization in congenital bicuspid aortic valve stenosis J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2011; 142(4): 895 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. C. Babaliaros, D. Liff, E. P. Chen, J. H. Rogers, R. A. Brown, V. H. Thourani, R. A. Guyton, S. Lerakis, A. E. Stillman, P. Raggi, et al. Can Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty Help Determine Appropriate Transcatheter Aortic Valve Size? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., October 1, 2008; 1(5): 580 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Carr and E. B. Savage Aortic valve repair for aortic insufficiency in adults: a contemporary review and comparison with replacement techniques Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 2004; 25(1): 6 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K.-L. Chan Is aortic stenosis a preventable disease? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 20, 2003; 42(4): 593 - 599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L Wallby, B Janerot-Sjoberg, T Steffensen, and M Broqvist T lymphocyte infiltration in non-rheumatic aortic stenosis: a comparative descriptive study between tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves Heart, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 348 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Weinschelbaum, P. Stutzbach, M. Oliva, J. Zaidman, A. Torino, and E. Gabe MANUAL DEBRIDEMENT OF THE AORTIC VALVE IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH DEGENERATIVE AORTIC STENOSIS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 1999; 117(6): 1157 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. D. O'Brien, D. D. Reichenbach, S. M. Marcovina, J. Kuusisto, C. E. Alpers, and C. M. Otto Apolipoproteins B, (a), and E Accumulate in the Morphologically Early Lesion of `Degenerative' Valvular Aortic Stenosis Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 1996; 16(4): 523 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text]