JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 15:1087-1092
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Falk, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Falk, R.

Impact of prospective peer review on pacemaker implantation rates in Massachusetts

RH Falk

Department of Medicine, Boston City Hospital, Massachusetts 02118.

Preapproval of elective permanent pacemaker insertions in Medicare patients is now mandatory for reimbursement. Of 1,860 requests for approval of an initial pacemaker implant in Massachusetts, 1,494 (80.3%) met strict Medicare guidelines and were approved by a nurse reviewer, and 366 (19.7%) were referred to an independent physician because of a question of appropriateness of indication or type of pacemaker. Only five requests (0.27%) were denied because of an inappropriate indication for pacing. On a second review of these records, an additional eight pacemaker insertions (0.43%) were deemed to have been inappropriately approved. Comparison of the annualized number of pacemaker requests for the study period with those of the 3 years before mandatory approval revealed a reduction of only 3.7%. Thus, contrary to previous findings in other areas of the country, in Massachusetts, inappropriate pacemaker insertions are rare and the effect of the prior approval process is minimal.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
CAN PEER REVIEW PREVENT UNNECESSARY PACEMAKER INSERTIONS
Journal Watch (General), April 17, 1990; 1990(417): 8 - 8.
[Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.