JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 15:1075-1081
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhandari, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rahimtoola, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhandari, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rahimtoola, S.

Day to day reproducibility of electrically inducible ventricular arrhythmias in survivors of acute myocardial infarction

AK Bhandari, R Hong, D Kulick, R Petersen, JN Rubin, C Leon, N McIntosh, and SH Rahimtoola

Department of Medicine, LAC-USC Medical Center.

Day to day reproducibility of the response to programmed ventricular stimulation has not been evaluated in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Programmed ventricular stimulation was performed prospectively on 2 consecutive days in 56 patients on an average of 12 +/- 5 days (range 7 to 29) after an acute myocardial infarction. No patient had a history of documented or suspected sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation occurring greater than 48 h after infarction. During initial programmed ventricular stimulation, 21 patients had induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (Group I), and 35 patients had induction of either nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or no ventricular tachycardia (Group II). Repeat programmed ventricular stimulation in Group I patients induced sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in 16 of 21 patients (reproducibility 76%); the maximal induced response in the other 5 patients was nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 2 patients and fewer than six repetitive ventricular responses in 3 patients. The day to day reproducibility was significantly higher for inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia of cycle length greater than or equal to 240 ms compared with rapid sustained ventricular tachycardia of cycle length less than 240 ms (100% versus 44%, p less than 0.009) or ventricular fibrillation (100% versus 43%, p less than 0.009). Repeat programmed ventricular stimulation in Group II patients did not induce sustained ventricular arrhythmias in 31 of 35 patients (reproducibility 89%). Thus, in survivors of acute myocardial infarction, inducible slow sustained ventricular tachycardia was a highly reproducible finding, whereas inducibility of rapid sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation showed a significant day to day variability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. E. Buxton, K. L. Lee, L. DiCarlo, M. R. Gold, G. S. Greer, E. N. Prystowsky, M. F. O'Toole, A. Tang, J. D. Fisher, J. Coromilas, et al.
Electrophysiologic Testing to Identify Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Who Are at Risk for Sudden Death
N. Engl. J. Med., June 29, 2000; 342(26): 1937 - 1945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.