JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 15:1043-1051
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheikh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kisslo, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheikh, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kisslo, J

Relation of quantitative coronary lesion measurements to the development of exercise-induced ischemia assessed by exercise echocardiography

KH Sheikh, Bengtson JR, S Helmy, C Juarez, R Burgess, TM Bashore, and J Kisslo

Department of Medicine/Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

To assess the relation of quantitative measures of coronary stenoses to the development of exercise-induced regional wall motion abnormalities, 34 patients with isolated, single vessel coronary artery lesions and normal wall motion at rest underwent exercise echocardiography and quantitative angiography on the same day. Although all 11 patients with a visually estimated stenosis greater than or equal to 75% had an ischemic response and 10 (91%) of 11 patients with a less than or equal to 25% visually estimated stenosis had a normal response by exercise echocardiography, among 12 patients with a visually estimated stenosis of 50%, 6 (50%) had an ischemic response and 6 (50%) had a normal exercise echocardiogram. Quantitative measurements of stenosis severity distinguished patients with ischemic (group 1) from normal (group 2) exercise echocardiographic responses as follows: minimal luminal diameter (mm), group 1 1.0 +/- 0.4 versus group 2 1.7 +/- 0.4, p less than 0.0001; minimal cross-sectional area (mm2), group 1 0.9 +/- 0.6 versus group 2 2.5 +/- 1.1, p less than 0.0001; percent diameter stenosis, group 1 68.3 +/- 14.2 versus group 2 42.2 +/- 12.1, p less than 0.0001; and percent area stenosis, group 1 87.5 +/- 7.8 versus group 2 64.8 +/- 15.9, p less than 0.0001. These data validate the utility of exercise echocardiography by demonstrating that 1) coronary stenosis severity measured by quantitative angiography is closely related to wall motion abnormalities detected by exercise echocardiography, and 2) exercise echocardiography can be used as a noninvasive means to assess the physiologic significance of coronary artery lesions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
S Moir, L Hanekom, Z-Y Fang, B Haluska, C Wong, M Burgess, and T H Marwick
Relationship between myocardial perfusion and dysfunction in diabetic cardiomyopathy: a study of quantitative contrast echocardiography and strain rate imaging
Heart, October 1, 2006; 92(10): 1414 - 1419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Moir, B. A. Haluska, C. Jenkins, R. Fathi, and T. H. Marwick
Incremental Benefit of Myocardial Contrast to Combined Dipyridamole-Exercise Stress Echocardiography for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease
Circulation, August 31, 2004; 110(9): 1108 - 1113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. D. Cheitlin, W. F. Armstrong, G. P. Aurigemma, G. A. Beller, F. Z. Bierman, J. L. Davis, P. S. Douglas, D. P. Faxon, L. D. Gillam, T. R. Kimball, et al.
ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: summary article: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE committee to update the 1997 guidelines for the clinical application of echocardiography)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 3, 2003; 42(5): 954 - 970.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. D. Cheitlin, W. F. Armstrong, G. P. Aurigemma, G. A. Beller, F. Z. Bierman, J. L. Davis, P. S. Douglas, D. P. Faxon, L. D. Gillam, T. R. Kimball, et al.
ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 Guideline Update for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography: Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography)
Circulation, September 2, 2003; 108(9): 1146 - 1162.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Atar, T. Nagai, B. Cercek, T. Z. Naqvi, H. Luo, and R. J. Siegel
Pacing stress echocardiography: an alternative to pharmacologic stress testing
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2000; 36(6): 1935 - 1941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. D. Beleslin, M. Ostojic, A. Djordjevic-Dikic, R. Babic, M. Nedeljkovic, G. Stankovic, S. Stojkovic, J. Marinkovic, I. Nedeljkovic, J. Stepanovic, et al.
Integrated evaluation of relation between coronary lesion features and stress echocardiography results: the importance of coronary lesion morphology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 1999; 33(3): 717 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.