JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 15:817-824
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rothbart, R.
Right arrow Articles by Teague, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rothbart, R.
Right arrow Articles by Teague, S.

Determination of aortic valve area by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in patients with normal and stenotic bioprosthetic valves

RM Rothbart, JL Castriz, LV Harding, CD Russo, and SM Teague

Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Florida.

To assess the feasibility and accuracy of determining bioprosthetic aortic valve area from two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic measurements, three partially overlapping groups were selected from 55 patients with such bioprosthetic valves and adequate Doppler studies. These were Group 1, 37 patients with recent aortic valve replacement surgery and no clinical or echocardiographic evidence of valve dysfunction; Group 2, 12 patients with prosthetic valve stenosis documented by cardiac catheterization; and Group 3, 22 patients with both Doppler and catheterization studies in whom noninvasive and invasive determinations of aortic valve area could be directly compared. Left ventricular outflow tract diameter was measured from two-dimensional still frame images. Flow velocity proximal to the aortic valve, transvalvular velocity and acceleration time were determined from pulsed and continuous wave Doppler spectra. Aortic valve gradient was calculated with the modified Bernoulli equation and valve area by the continuity equation. In the 37 patients with a normally functioning valve, the calculated mean gradient ranged from 5 to 25 mm Hg (average 13.6 +/- 5.2) and valve area from 1.0 to 2.3 cm2 (mean 1.6 +/- 0.31). Linear regression analysis of prosthetic aortic valve area determined by Doppler imaging and cardiac catheterization demonstrated a high correlation (r = 0.93) between the two techniques. Comparison of the patients with and without prosthetic valve stenosis revealed statistically significant differences in mean gradient (42.8 +/- 12.3 versus 13.6 +/- 5.2 mm Hg; p = 0.0001), acceleration time (116 +/- 15 versus 80 +/- 13 ms; p = 0.0001) and valve area by the continuity equation (0.80 +/- 0.16 versus 1.6 +/- 0.31 cm2; p = 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
R. Haaverstad, N. Vitale, A. Karevold, G. Cappabianca, A. Tromsdal, P. S. Olsen, L. Kober, H. Ihlen, K. A. Rein, and J. L Svennevig
Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of the Medtronic Advantage aortic valve prosthesis: the Scandinavian multicentre, prospective study
Heart, April 1, 2007; 93(4): 500 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. B. Chambers, L. Oo, A. Narracott, P. M. Lawford, and C. I. Blauth
Nominal size in six bileaflet mechanical aortic valves: A comparison of orifice size and biologic equivalence
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2003; 125(6): 1388 - 1393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. D. Maslow, J. M. Haering, S. Heindel, J. Mashikian, R. Levine, and P. Douglas
An Evaluation of Prosthetic Aortic Valves Using Transesophageal Echocardiography: The Double-Envelope Technique
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 509 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. S. Khan, R. J. Siegel, M. A. DeRobertis, C. E. Blanche, R. M. Kass, W. Cheng, G. P. Fontana, and A. Trento
Regression of hypertrophy after Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 69(2): 531 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Y. Leung, J. Wong, L. Rodriguez, M. Pu, P. M. Vandervoort, and J. D. Thomas
Application of Color Doppler Flow Mapping to Calculate Orifice Area of St Jude Mitral Valve
Circulation, September 22, 1998; 98(12): 1205 - 1211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. L. McDonald, R. C. Daly, H. V. Schaff, C. J. Mullany, F. A. Miller, J. J. Morris, and T. A. Orszulak
Hemodynamic Performance of Small Aortic Valve Bioprostheses: Is There a Difference?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1997; 63(2): 362 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. De Paulis, L. Sommariva, F. Russo, F. Tomai, A. Tondo, C. Pagliaricci, C. Bassano, and L. Chiariello
Doppler echocardiography evaluation of the CarboMedics valve in patients with small aortic anulus and valve prosthesis-body surface area mismatch
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1994; 108(1): 57 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.