JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 15:159-162
© 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, D.
Right arrow Articles by Julsrud, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holmes, D., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Julsrud, P.

Effect of pulsed progressive fluoroscopy on reduction of radiation dose in the cardiac catheterization laboratory

DR Holmes Jr, MA Wondrow, JE Gray, RJ Vetter, JL Fellows, and PR Julsrud

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905.

The increased application of therapeutic interventional cardiology procedures is associated with increased radiation exposure to physicians, patients and technical personnel. New advances in imaging techniques have the potential for reducing radiation exposure. A progressive scanning video system with a standard vascular phantom has been shown to decrease entrance radiation exposure. The effect of this system on reducing actual radiation exposure to physicians and technicians was assessed from 1984 through 1987. During this time, progressive fluoroscopy was added sequentially to all four adult catheterization laboratories; no changes in shielding procedures were made. During this time, the case load per physician increased by 63% and the number of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures (a high radiation procedure) increased by 244%. Despite these increases in both case load and higher radiation procedures, the average radiation exposure per physician declined by 37%. During the same time, the radiation exposure for technicians decreased by 35%. Pulsed progressive fluoroscopy is effective for reducing radiation exposure to catheterization laboratory physicians and technical staff.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
A. Trianni, R. Padovani, C. Foti, E. Cragnolini, G. Chizzola, H. Toh, G. Bernardi, and A. Proclemer
Dose to cardiologists in haemodynamic and electrophysiology cardiac interventional procedures
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2005; 117(1-3): 111 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. Chida, H. Saito, M. Zuguchi, K. Shirotori, S. Kumagai, H. Nakayama, K. Matsubara, and M. Kohzuki
Does Digital Acquisition Reduce Patients' Skin Dose in Cardiac Interventional Procedures? An Experimental Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 1111 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Xu, H. Q. Le, and S. Molloi
Patient-specific Region-of-Interest Fluoroscopy Device for X-ray Dose Reduction
Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 585 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. R. Koenig, F. A. Mettler, and L. K. Wagner
Skin Injuries from Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures: Part 2, Review of 73 Cases and Recommendations for Minimizing Dose Delivered to Patient
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2001; 177(1): 13 - 20.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. M. Bashore, E. R. Bates, P. B. Berger, D. A. Clark, J. T. Cusma, G. J. Dehmer, M. J. Kern, W. K. Laskey, M. P. O'Laughlin, S. Oesterle, et al.
American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Standards: A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents endorsed by the American Heart Association and the Diagnostic and Interventional Catheterization Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the AHA
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2170 - 2214.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. W. L. Boland, B. Murphy, R. Arellano, L. Niklason, and P. R. Mueller
Dose Reduction in Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Fluoroscopy: Use of Grid-Controlled Pulsed Fluoroscopy
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1453 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. D. Eisenhauer
Aortocoronary graft markers and subsequent catheterization
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2000; 69(5): 1645 - 1646.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
L Dehen, C Vilmer, C Humilière, T Corcos, D Pentousis, L Ollivaud, D Chatelain, and L Dubertret
Chronic radiodermatitis following cardiac catheterisation: a report of two cases and a brief review of the literature
Heart, March 1, 1999; 81(3): 308 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. T. Cusma, M. R. Bell, M. A. Wondrow, J. P. Taubel, and D. R. Holmes Jr.
Real-time measurement of radiation exposure to patients during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous interventional procedures
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 1, 1999; 33(2): 427 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1990 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.