Comparison of the internal defibrillation thresholds for monophasic and double and single capacitor biphasic waveforms

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

Implantable cardiac defibrillators are now an accepted form of therapy for patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias that cannot be controlled by antiarrhythmic drugs. These devices could be made even more acceptable if they were smaller, had increased longevity and the surgical procedure for implantation was less invasive. Reducing the energy requirements for internal defibrillation with use of a nonthoracotomy system would make all of these goals achievable. Monophasic and double and single capacitor biphasic waveforms were compared in 14 anesthetized dogs (25.5 +/- 2.2 kg) with use of a nonthoracotomy lead system that has previously been shown to distribute the delivered voltage throughout the heart more equally. Cathodal catheter electrodes were placed in the right ventricular apex and outflow tract. The anodal electrode was a large cutaneous R2 patch placed over the left side of the chest. The mean energy requirement for defibrillation when a single capacitor biphasic waveform was used was significantly less (6.4 +/- 2.6 J) than that for either the double capacitor biphasic or the monophasic waveform (18.0 +/- 8.0 and 17.4 +/- 8.0 J, respectively) of the same duration. Unexpectedly, the leading edge voltage for the phase I of the single capacitor biphasic waveform was significantly less (266 +/- 51 V) than that for either the double capacitor biphasic or the monophasic waveform (336 +/- 76 and 427 +/- 117 V, respectively). In conclusion, in large dogs, defibrillation is possible at low energy levels with a single capacitor biphasic waveform.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. A. Mowrey, Y. Cheng, P. J. Tchou, and I. R. Efimov Kinetics of defibrillation shock-induced response: design implications for the optimal defibrillation waveform Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(1): 27 - 39. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mittal, S. Ayati, K. M. Stein, D. Schwartzman, D. Cavlovich, P. J. Tchou, S. M. Markowitz, D. J. Slotwiner, M. A. Scheiner, and B. B. Lerman Transthoracic Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation : Comparison of Rectilinear Biphasic Versus Damped Sine Wave Monophasic Shocks Circulation, March 21, 2000; 101(11): 1282 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mittal, S. Ayati, K. M. Stein, B. P. Knight, F. Morady, D. Schwartzman, D. Cavlovich, E. V. Platia, H. Calkins, P. J. Tchou, et al. Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1595 - 1601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Windecker, R. E. Ideker, V. J. Plumb, G. N. Kay, G. P. Walcott, and A. E. Epstein The influence of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms in humans J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 33 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Tomassoni, K. Newby, S. Deshpande, K. Axtell, J. Sra, M. Akhtar, and A. Natale Defibrillation Efficacy of Commercially Available Biphasic Impulses in Humans : Importance of Negative-Phase Peak Voltage Circulation, April 1, 1997; 95(7): 1822 - 1826. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. A. S. Cooper, E. E. Johnson, and J. M. Wharton Internal Atrial Defibrillation in Humans : Improved Efficacy of Biphasic Waveforms and the Importance of Phase Duration Circulation, March 18, 1997; 95(6): 1487 - 1496. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. E. Gliner, T. E. Lyster, S. M. Dillion, and G. H. Bardy Transthoracic Defibrillation of Swine With Monophasic and Biphasic Waveforms Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1634 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. S. Manolis Transvenous Endocardial Cardioverter Defibrillator Systems: Is the Future Here? Arch Intern Med, March 28, 1994; 154(6): 617 - 622. [Abstract] [PDF]