|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1989; 14:672-676 © 1989 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Tennessee.
Both two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography provide accurate estimates of left ventricular mass. However, their reproducibility in serial studies has not been compared, although this issue is critical to evaluation of regression of hypertrophy. To determine which technique provides more reproducible estimates of left ventricular mass, three serial studies were performed prospectively in each of eight normal adults over 5 months. Both two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiograms were obtained at each of these 24 studies. Measurements were performed by two independent observers who did not know patient identity. For the two-dimensional method, left ventricular mass was determined with use of a computer light-pen system and the truncated ellipsoid formula. For the M-mode method, mass was calculated from Penn convention measurements with use of the cube formula. At study 1 the group mean left ventricular mass by two-dimensional echocardiography (115 +/- 20 g) did not differ from that by M-mode study (127 +/- 37 g, p = NS). However, serial estimates of left ventricular mass were more reproducible by two-dimensional echocardiography. The mean difference among the three serial two-dimensional studies in each individual was 4.8 +/- 4 g (4.2 +/- 3%) by the two-dimensional method, but was 18.5 +/- 13 g (14.9 +/- 10%) by the M-mode method (p = 0.01). Interobserver results for left ventricular mass by two-dimensional echocardiography correlated closely (r = 0.95, n = 24, p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. G. Myerson, N. G. Bellenger, and D. J. Pennell Assessment of Left Ventricular Mass by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Hypertension, March 1, 2002; 39(3): 750 - 755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Takuma, K. Suehiro, C. Cardinale, T. Hozumi, H. Yano, J. Shimizu, S. Mullis-Jansson, R. Sciacca, J. Wang, D. Burkhoff, et al. Anesthetic inhibition in ischemic and nonischemic murine heart: comparison with conscious echocardiographic approach Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): H2364 - H2370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Palmieri, B. Dahlof, V. DeQuattro, N. Sharpe, J. N. Bella, G. de Simone, M. Paranicas, D. Fishman, and R. B. Devereux Reliability of echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular structure and function: The PRESERVE study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1625 - 1632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. D. Miller, T. J. Donohue, T. L. Wolford, M. J. Kern, S. R. Bergmann, C. M. Mechem, and J. J. Hartman Assessment of Blood Flow Distal to Coronary Artery Stenoses: Correlations Between Myocardial Positron Emission Tomography and Poststenotic Intracoronary Doppler Flow Reserve Circulation, November 15, 1996; 94(10): 2447 - 2454. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. D. Waggoner and C. Davis Quantitative Echoca rdiograpy Part III: A Review of Methods for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Performance by Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, November 1, 1995; 11(6): 285 - 299. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |
