JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1989; 14:515-522
© 1989 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brush, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bonow, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brush, J., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Bonow, R.

Comparative effects of verapamil and nitroprusside on left ventricular function in patients with hypertension

JE Brush Jr, JE Udelson, SL Bacharach, RO Cannon 3rd, MB Leon, TF Rumble, and RO Bonow

Cardiology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

The effects of verapamil were compared with those of nitroprusside at matched mean arterial pressures and heart rates in 10 symptomatic hypertensive patients during cardiac catheterization. Simultaneous radionuclide angiography and micromanometer pressure measurements were obtained to assess left ventricular pressure-volume relations. Compared with control conditions, verapamil increased left ventricular end-diastolic volume index from 57 +/- 16 to 70 +/- 28 ml/m2 (p = 0.05) without a significant increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (from 10 +/- 4 to 13 +/- 6 mm Hg). Despite a downward and rightward shift in the end-systolic pressure-volume relation indicating negative inotropic effects, ejection fraction did not decrease significantly (from 52 +/- 9% to 46 +/- 9%); cardiac index and stroke volume index remained unchanged. The change in stroke volume index with verapamil was directly related to the magnitude of change in end-diastolic volume index (r = 0.82, p less than 0.005), suggesting that the increase in end-diastolic volume did not arise purely from negative inotropic effects. Systemic vascular resistance index decreased from 42 +/- 8 to 34 +/- 7 mm Hg.min.m2/liter (p less than 0.05). In contrast, nitroprusside decreased left ventricular end-diastolic volume index from 57 +/- 16 to 41 +/- 10 ml/m2 (p less than 0.05), cardiac index from 3.2 +/- 0.7 to 2.8 +/- 0.6 liters/min per m2 (p less than 0.05) and stroke volume index from 28 +/- 6 to 24 +/- 5 ml/m2 (p less than 0.01), with no change in systemic vascular resistance index (40 +/- 10 mm Hg.min.m2).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.