Comparison of monophasic with single and dual capacitor biphasic waveforms for nonthoracotomy canine internal defibrillation

Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.

Monophasic and single capacitor and dual capacitor biphasic truncated exponential shocks were tested in pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs with use of a nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation pathway consisting of a right ventricular catheter electrode and a subcutaneous chest wall patch electrode. Seven dogs weighing 20.2 +/- 0.5 kg were utilized. Monophasic pulses of 10 ms duration were compared with three biphasic pulses. All biphasic waveforms had an initial positive phase (P1) followed by a terminal negative phase (P2) and the total duration of P1 plus P2 was 10 ms. The dual capacitor biphasic waveform (P1 9 ms, P2 1 ms) had equal initial voltages of P1 and P2. Two simulated single capacitor biphasic waveforms were also tested, the first designed to minimize the magnitude of P2 (P1 9 ms, P2 1 ms with initial voltage of P2 equal to 0.3 of the initial voltage of P1) and the second to maximize P2 (P1 5 ms, P2 5 ms with initial voltage of P2 = 0.5 P1). Alternating current was used to induce ventricular fibrillation and four trials of eight initial voltages from 100 to 800 V were performed for each of the four waveforms. Stepwise logistic regression was utilized to construct curves relating probability of successful defibrillation and energy. In the logistic model, the dual capacitor biphasic and single capacitor biphasic waveforms that maximized P2 were associated with significantly (p less than 0.001) lower energy requirements for defibrillation than those of the monophasic waveform. The single capacitor biphasic waveform that minimized P2 was not significantly better than the monophasic waveform.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Tang, M. H. Weil, S. Sun, H. Yamaguchi, H. P. Povoas, A. M. Pernat, and J. Bisera The effects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on postresuscitation myocardial function J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 815 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Sims, A. W. Miller, and M. R. Ujhelyi Disparate effects of biphasic and monophasic shocks on postshock refractory period dispersion Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 1998; 274(6): H1943 - H1949. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. O. Cummins, M. F. Hazinski, R. E. Kerber, P. Kudenchuk, L. Becker, G. Nichol, B. Malanga, T. P. Aufderheide, E. M. Stapleton, K. Kern, et al. Low-Energy Biphasic Waveform Defibrillation: Evidence-Based Review Applied to Emergency Cardiovascular Care Guidelines : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association Committee on Emergency Cardiovascular Care and the Subcommittees on Basic Life Support, Advanced Cardiac Life Support, and Pediatric Resuscitation Circulation, April 28, 1998; 97(16): 1654 - 1667. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Tomassoni, K. Newby, S. Deshpande, K. Axtell, J. Sra, M. Akhtar, and A. Natale Defibrillation Efficacy of Commercially Available Biphasic Impulses in Humans : Importance of Negative-Phase Peak Voltage Circulation, April 1, 1997; 95(7): 1822 - 1826. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. E. Gliner, T. E. Lyster, S. M. Dillion, and G. H. Bardy Transthoracic Defibrillation of Swine With Monophasic and Biphasic Waveforms Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1634 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				O. H. Tovar and J. L. Jones Biphasic Defibrillation Waveforms Reduce Shock-Induced Response Duration Dispersion Between Low and High Shock Intensities Circ. Res., August 1, 1995; 77(2): 430 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. J. Souza, R. A. Malkin, and R. E. Ideker Comparison of Upper Limit of Vulnerability and Defibrillation Probability of Success Curves Using a Nonthoracotomy Lead System Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1247 - 1252. [Abstract] [Full Text]