Use of electrophysiologic testing in patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: prognostic and therapeutic implications

Section of Cardiology, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108.

Forty patients with coronary artery disease and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring underwent programmed electrical stimulation. In 22 patients, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was induced at baseline drug-free electrophysiologic testing; 9 of these patients subsequently developed a clinical sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. In 18 patients, no tachycardia could be induced, and none of these 18 had subsequent tachycardia. In 25 of the 40 patients, arrhythmia management was guided by the results of electrophysiologic testing; this group included 11 patients who received antiarrhythmic therapy for induced ventricular tachycardia and 14 patients without inducible ventricular tachycardia who did not receive antiarrhythmic therapy. In the remaining 15 patients, arrhythmia management was not based on the results of electrophysiologic testing. Only two episodes of clinical sustained tachyarrhythmia occurred in the group receiving electrophysiologically guided therapy compared with seven episodes in the group treated without electrophysiologic guidance (p less than 0.01). Thus, in patients with coronary artery disease with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on ambulatory electrocardiography, electrophysiologic testing can identify those at high and low risk for subsequent clinical tachycardia events. Furthermore, results of such testing can be used to optimize arrhythmia management in these patients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. A. Pires, M. H. Lehmann, A. E. Buxton, G. E. Hafley, K. L. Lee, and the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Inve Differences in inducibility and prognosis of in-hospital versus out-of-hospital identified nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: clinical and trial design implications J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2001; 38(4): 1156 - 1162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Welch, R. L. Page, and M. H. Hamdan Management of ventricular arrhythmias: A trial-based approach J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 621 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Goldberger Treatment and Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: Effect of Recent Clinical Trials Arch Intern Med, June 28, 1999; 159(12): 1281 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Buxton, G. E. Hafley, M. H. Lehmann, M. Gold, M. O'Toole, A. Tang, J. Coromilas, B. Hook, N. J. Stamato, and K. L. Lee Prediction of Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia Inducible by Programmed Stimulation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease : Utility of Clinical Variables Circulation, April 13, 1999; 99(14): 1843 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Grimm, J.u. Hoffmann, V. Menz, K. Luck, and B. Maisch Programmed ventricular stimulation for arrhythmia risk prediction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1998; 32(3): 739 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]