Doppler color flow mapping in the evaluation of prosthetic mitral and aortic valve function

Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35294.

Doppler color flow mapping and color-guided conventional Doppler studies were performed on 119 patients with 126 prosthetic valves (mitral alone in 60, aortic alone in 52 and both mitral and aortic in 7 patients) within 2 weeks of the catheterization study or surgery, or both. The mean pressure gradients derived by color-guided continuous wave Doppler ultrasound correlated well with those obtained at catheterization for both the tissue and mechanical mitral and aortic prostheses (r = 0.85 to 0.87). For the effective prosthetic orifice areas, better correlation with catheterization results were obtained with the tissue mitral (r = 0.94) and tissue aortic (r = 0.87) prostheses than with the mechanical mitral (r = 0.79) and mechanical aortic (r = 0.76) prostheses. The maximal width of the color flow signals at their origin from the tissue mitral prostheses also correlated well with the effective prosthetic orifice area at catheterization (r = 0.81). Doppler color flow mapping identified prosthetic valvular regurgitation with a sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 100%, respectively, for the mitral and 92% and 83% for the aortic prostheses. There was complete agreement between the Doppler color flow mapping and angiographic grading of the severity of prosthetic valvular regurgitation in 90% of mitral and 73.5% of the aortic regurgitant prostheses with under- or overestimation by greater than 1 grade in only two cases. Valvular and paravalvular regurgitation was correctly categorized by Doppler color flow mapping in relation to the surgical findings in 94% of the mitral and 80.5% of the aortic prostheses.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. R. Moss, E. Ivens, S. Pasupati, K. Humphries, C. R. Thompson, B. Munt, A. Sinhal, and J. G. Webb Role of Echocardiography in Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., January 1, 2008; 1(1): 15 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. G. Davila-Roman, A. D. Waggoner, E. D. Kennard, R. Holubkov, W. R. E. Jamieson, L. Englberger, T. P. Carrel, and H. V. Schaff Prevalence and severity of paravalvular regurgitation in the Artificial Valve Endocarditis Reduction Trial (AVERT) echocardiography study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1467 - 1472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Ionescu, A G Fraser, and E G Butchart Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental paraprosthetic valvar regurgitation: a prospective study using transoesophageal echocardiography Heart, November 1, 2003; 89(11): 1316 - 1321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Barbetseas, S. F. Nagueh, C. Pitsavos, P. K. Toutouzas, M. A. Quinones, and W. A. Zoghbi Differentiating thrombus from pannus formation in obstructed mechanical prosthetic valves: an evaluation of clinical, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic parameters J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1998; 32(5): 1410 - 1417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. McDonald, R. C. Daly, H. V. Schaff, C. J. Mullany, F. A. Miller, J. J. Morris, and T. A. Orszulak Hemodynamic Performance of Small Aortic Valve Bioprostheses: Is There a Difference? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1997; 63(2): 362 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				W. Vongpatanasin, L. D. Hillis, and R. A. Lange Prosthetic Heart Valves N. Engl. J. Med., August 8, 1996; 335(6): 407 - 416. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.G. Cape, W. Jaarsma, and A.P. Yoganathan Echo Doppler principles, techniques and applications for the cardiac surgeon Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1992; 6(suppl_1): S2 - S12. [Abstract] [PDF]