Doppler color flow mapping in the evaluation of prosthetic mitral and aortic valve function

Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35294.

Doppler color flow mapping and color-guided conventional Doppler studies were performed on 119 patients with 126 prosthetic valves (mitral alone in 60, aortic alone in 52 and both mitral and aortic in 7 patients) within 2 weeks of the catheterization study or surgery, or both. The mean pressure gradients derived by color-guided continuous wave Doppler ultrasound correlated well with those obtained at catheterization for both the tissue and mechanical mitral and aortic prostheses (r = 0.85 to 0.87). For the effective prosthetic orifice areas, better correlation with catheterization results were obtained with the tissue mitral (r = 0.94) and tissue aortic (r = 0.87) prostheses than with the mechanical mitral (r = 0.79) and mechanical aortic (r = 0.76) prostheses. The maximal width of the color flow signals at their origin from the tissue mitral prostheses also correlated well with the effective prosthetic orifice area at catheterization (r = 0.81). Doppler color flow mapping identified prosthetic valvular regurgitation with a sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 100%, respectively, for the mitral and 92% and 83% for the aortic prostheses. There was complete agreement between the Doppler color flow mapping and angiographic grading of the severity of prosthetic valvular regurgitation in 90% of mitral and 73.5% of the aortic regurgitant prostheses with under- or overestimation by greater than 1 grade in only two cases. Valvular and paravalvular regurgitation was correctly categorized by Doppler color flow mapping in relation to the surgical findings in 94% of the mitral and 80.5% of the aortic prostheses.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Jabbour, T. F. Ismail, N. Moat, A. Gulati, I. Roussin, F. Alpendurada, B. Park, F. Okoroafor, A. Asgar, S. Barker, et al. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2011; 58(21): 2165 - 2173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Colli, R. D'Amico, J. Kempfert, M. A. Borger, F. W. Mohr, and T. Walther Transesophageal echocardiographic scoring for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Impact of aortic cusp calcification on postoperative aortic regurgitation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2011; 142(5): 1229 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Ye, A. Cheung, S. V. Lichtenstein, F. Nietlispach, S. Albugami, J. B. Masson, C. R. Thompson, B. Munt, R. Moss, R. G. Carere, et al. Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Follow-up to 3 years J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2010; 139(5): 1107 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Detaint, L. Lepage, D. Himbert, E. Brochet, D. Messika-Zeitoun, B. Iung, and A. Vahanian Determinants of Significant Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Impact of Device and Annulus Discongruence J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., September 1, 2009; 2(9): 821 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. R. Moss, E. Ivens, S. Pasupati, K. Humphries, C. R. Thompson, B. Munt, A. Sinhal, and J. G. Webb Role of echocardiography in percutaneous aortic valve implantation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., January 1, 2008; 1(1): 15 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. G. Davila-Roman, A. D. Waggoner, E. D. Kennard, R. Holubkov, W. R. E. Jamieson, L. Englberger, T. P. Carrel, and H. V. Schaff Prevalence and severity of paravalvular regurgitation in the Artificial Valve Endocarditis Reduction Trial (AVERT) echocardiography study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1467 - 1472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Ionescu, A G Fraser, and E G Butchart Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental paraprosthetic valvar regurgitation: a prospective study using transoesophageal echocardiography Heart, November 1, 2003; 89(11): 1316 - 1321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Barbetseas, S. F. Nagueh, C. Pitsavos, P. K. Toutouzas, M. A. Quinones, and W. A. Zoghbi Differentiating thrombus from pannus formation in obstructed mechanical prosthetic valves: an evaluation of clinical, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic parameters J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1998; 32(5): 1410 - 1417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. McDonald, R. C. Daly, H. V. Schaff, C. J. Mullany, F. A. Miller, J. J. Morris, and T. A. Orszulak Hemodynamic Performance of Small Aortic Valve Bioprostheses: Is There a Difference? Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1997; 63(2): 362 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. G. Cape, W. Jaarsma, and A. P. Yoganathan Echo Doppler principles, techniques and applications for the cardiac surgeon Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 1, 1992; 6(Supplement_1): S2 - S12. [Abstract] [PDF]