cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1989; 13:1042-1051
© 1989 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kern, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gudipati, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kern, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gudipati, C

Effects of pharmacologic coronary hyperemia on echocardiographic left ventricular function in patients with single vessel coronary artery disease

MJ Kern, AC Pearson, AJ Labovitz, U Deligonul, M Vandormael, and C Gudipati

Department of Internal Medicine, St. Louis University Hospital, Missouri 63104.

To assess whether pharmacologic coronary vasodilation could provoke new left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in patients with single vessel coronary artery disease, systemic hemodynamics, coronary blood flow velocity and left ventricular wall motion were measured by two-dimensional echocardiography during administration of 10 mg of intracoronary papaverine in 14 patients before and again immediately after left coronary angioplasty (group 1). As a comparison with an intravenous method, left ventricular wall motion was analyzed after 0.56 mg/kg body weight of intravenous dipyridamole in a separate group of 13 patients with single vessel coronary disease (group 2). Heart rate-blood pressure product increased 3% to 6% in papaverine-treated patients and 14 +/- 11% (p = NS) in dipyridamole-treated patients. No angiographic collateral vessels were present in either group. Although intracoronary mean flow velocity measured in the 14 group 1 patients and in 5 normal control subjects during papaverine treatment increased from 125% to 400% of basal flow velocity, papaverine induced new left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in only 5 of the 14 patients before coronary angioplasty. In three of five patients, left ventricular wall motion abnormalities persisted after successful coronary angioplasty. Four of the 14 patients demonstrated augmentation of left ventricular wall motion with papaverine. After intravenous dipyridamole, only 3 of the 13 group 2 patients developed new left ventricular regional asynergy. These data suggest that selective (papaverine) and, most likely, global (dipyridamole) augmentation of coronary flow alone does not reliably identify potential ischemic left ventricular regions affected by critical single vessel coronary artery disease.




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home