Use of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure to assess severity of mitral stenosis: is true left atrial pressure needed in this condition?
RA Lange,
DM Moore Jr,
RG Cigarroa,
and
LD Hillis
Department of Internal Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235.
There is disagreement concerning the use of the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (in place of left atrial pressure) in assessing the presence and severity of mitral valve disease. This study was done to assess the accuracy and reliability of an oximetrically confirmed pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in measuring the transvalvular pressure gradient and valve area in patients with mitral stenosis. In 10 patients with mitral stenosis (1 man and 9 women; mean age +/- SD 47 +/- 7 years), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was measured through an 8F Goodale-Lubin catheter with its wedge position confirmed by oximetry (oxygen saturation greater than or equal to 95%). In addition, a transseptal left atrial pressure was measured through a Brockenbrough catheter and left ventricular pressure was measured through a pigtail catheter. The mean and phasic left atrial and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were similar (mean left atrial pressure 18 +/- 6 mm Hg; mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure 18 +/- 8 mm Hg; p = NS). When the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was used without adjustment for time delay, the transvalvular pressure gradient (9.8 +/- 3.3 mm Hg) and valve area (1.5 +/- 0.5 cm2) were significantly different (p less than 0.05) from the values obtained with use of left atrial pressure (7.2 +/- 2.9 mm Hg and 1.7 +/- 0.6 cm2, respectively). In contrast, when the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was adjusted for the time delay through the pulmonary vasculature, the difference in gradients averaged only 1.7 mm Hg and the mitral valve areas were similar.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kainuma, K. Taniguchi, T. Daimon, T. Sakaguchi, T. Funatsu, H. Kondoh, S. Miyagawa, K. Takeda, Y. Shudo, T. Masai, et al.
Does Stringent Restrictive Annuloplasty for Functional Mitral Regurgitation Cause Functional Mitral Stenosis and Pulmonary Hypertension?
Circulation,
September 13, 2011;
124(11_suppl_1):
S97 - S106.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. A. Carabello
Modern Management of Mitral Stenosis
Circulation,
July 19, 2005;
112(3):
432 - 437.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Prasad, K. Okazaki, A. A. Zadeh, E. Dijk, Q. Fu, J. D. Thomas, and B. D. Levine
Abnormalities of Doppler Measures of Diastolic Function in the Healthy Elderly Are Not Related to Alterations of Left Atrial Pressure
Circulation,
March 29, 2005;
111(12):
1499 - 1503.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G. Hurrell, R. A. Nishimura, S. T. Higano, C. P. Appleton, G. K. Danielson, D. R. Holmes Jr, and A. J. Tajik
Value of Dynamic Respiratory Changes in Left and Right Ventricular Pressures for the Diagnosis of Constrictive Pericarditis
Circulation,
June 1, 1996;
93(11):
2007 - 2013.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Voyce and J. M. Rippe
Pulmonary Artery Catheters: An Update
J Intensive Care Med,
July 1, 1990;
5(4):
175 - 192.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|