Pressure recovery distal to a stenosis: potential cause of gradient "overestimation" by Doppler echocardiography

Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Doppler ultrasound is currently being widely applied to measure intracardiac pressure gradients noninvasively. In comparative invasive studies, it is generally assumed that pressure is effectively uniform distal to the stenosis. As the poststenotic jet expands, however, its velocity decreases, and pressure is recovered to the extent permitted by turbulence, so that the measured gradient will be lower if the distal catheter is positioned downstream from the vena contracta. This can lead to apparent Doppler "overestimation" of the pressure gradient because of this phenomenon of pressure recovery. This study demonstrates that pressure recovery can be important in a variety of clinical settings studied by in vitro models. Although most prominent in streamlined tunnels modeled after the obstruction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, these effects are important even for central stenoses at physiologic flow rates. Because precise catheter position is not always known or controlled, these findings suggest an important advantage for Doppler gradient estimation, because it provides the maximal gradient at the vena contracta, which determines the load on the proximal chamber.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Giardini and T. A. Tacy Non-invasive estimation of pressure gradients in regurgitant jets: an overdue consideration Eur J Echocardiogr, September 1, 2008; 9(5): 578 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M. Popescu, E. Prokop, J. A. Elefteriades, K. Kett, and P. G. Barash Phantom Aortic Valve Pressure Gradient: Discrepancies Between Cardiac Catheterization and Doppler Echocardiography Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1259 - 1262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Garcia, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, L. Kadem, and P. Pibarot Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2003; 41(3): 435 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Levine and E. Schwammenthal Stenosis is in the eye of the observer: impact of pressure recovery on assessing aortic valve area J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2003; 41(3): 443 - 445. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Dias, R. S. Assad, L. F. Caneo, M. C. D. Abduch, V. D. Aiello, A. R. Dias, M. B. Marcial, and S. A. Oliveira Reversible pulmonary trunk banding. II. An experimental model for rapid pulmonary ventricular hypertrophy J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2002; 124(5): 999 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. X. Qin, T. Shiota, H. M. Lever, D. N. Rubin, F. Bauer, Y. J. Kim, M. Sitges, N. L. Greenberg, J. K. Drinko, M. Martin, et al. Impact of left ventricular outflow tract area on systolic outflow velocity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2002; 39(2): 308 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Maslow, J. M. Haering, S. Heindel, J. Mashikian, R. Levine, and P. Douglas An Evaluation of Prosthetic Aortic Valves Using Transesophageal Echocardiography: The Double-Envelope Technique Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 509 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Schulz-Menger, O. Strohm, J. Waigand, F. Uhlich, R. Dietz, and M. G. Friedrich The Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract in Patients With Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy After Septal Artery Embolization Circulation, April 18, 2000; 101(15): 1764 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gutberlet, T. Boeckel, N. Hosten, M. Vogel, T. Kühne, H. Oellinger, T. Ehrenstein, S. Venz, R. Hetzer, G. Bein, et al. Arterial Switch Procedure for D-Transposition of the Great Arteries: Quantitative Midterm Evaluation of Hemodynamic Changes with Cine MR Imaging and Phase-Shift Velocity Mapping-Initial Experience Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 467 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. G. DeGroff, R. Shandas, and L. Valdes-Cruz Pressure recovery and aortic stenosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 260 - 260. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Isaaz The ratio of post-valvular aorta to valvular orifice cross-sectional areas: a new haemodynamic index of clinical importance in patients with aortic stenosis? Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1294 - 1296. [PDF]

				W.A. Schobel, W. Voelker, K.K. Haase, and K.-R. Karsch Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1355 - 1363. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Baumgartner, T. Stefenelli, J. Niederberger, H. Schima, and G. Maurer "overestimation" of catheter gradients by doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1655 - 1661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Y. Leung, J. Wong, L. Rodriguez, M. Pu, P. M. Vandervoort, and J. D. Thomas Application of Color Doppler Flow Mapping to Calculate Orifice Area of St Jude Mitral Valve Circulation, September 22, 1998; 98(12): 1205 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H. Marcus, R. S. Heinrich, J. Bednarz, S. Lupovitch, J. Abruzzo, R. Borok, B. Vandenberg, R. E. Kerber, W. Piccione, A. P. Yoganathan, et al. Assessment of Small-Diameter Aortic Mechanical Prostheses : Physiological Relevance of the Doppler Gradient, Utility of Flow Augmentation, and Limitations of Orifice Area Estimation Circulation, September 1, 1998; 98(9): 866 - 872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. G. Cape, M. Jones, I. Yamada, M. D. VanAuker, and L. M. Valdes-Cruz Turbulent/Viscous Interactions Control Doppler/Catheter Pressure Discrepancies in Aortic Stenosis: The Role of the Reynolds Number Circulation, December 1, 1996; 94(11): 2975 - 2981. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Niederberger, H. Schima, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner Importance of Pressure Recovery for the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis by Doppler Ultrasound: Role of Aortic Size, Aortic Valve Area, and Direction of the Stenotic Jet In Vitro Circulation, October 15, 1996; 94(8): 1934 - 1940. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Bartunek, S. U. Sys, A. C. Rodrigues, E. Van Schuerbeeck, L. Mortier, and B. de Bruyne Abnormal Systolic Intraventricular Flow Velocities After Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis : Mechanisms, Predictive Factors, and Prognostic Significance Circulation, February 15, 1996; 93(4): 712 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. M. Vandervoort, N. L. Greenberg, M. Pu, K. A. Powell, D. M. Cosgrove, and J. D. Thomas Pressure Recovery in Bileaflet Heart Valve Prostheses : Localized High Velocities and Gradients in Central and Side Orifices With Implications for Doppler-Catheter Gradient Relation in Aortic and Mitral Position Circulation, December 15, 1995; 92(12): 3464 - 3472. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				W. Voelker, H. Reul, G. N. Ing, T. S. Ing, B. S. Ing, A. S. Ing, and K. R. Karsch Comparison of Valvular Resistance, Stroke Work Loss, and Gorlin Valve Area for Quantification of Aortic Stenosis : An In Vitro Study in a Pulsatile Aortic Flow Model Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1196 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text]