JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1989; 13:700-705
© 1989 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riggs, T.
Right arrow Articles by Batton, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riggs, T.
Right arrow Articles by Batton, D

Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of right and left ventricular diastolic function in normal neonates

TW Riggs, R Rodriguez, AR Snider, and D Batton

Department of Pediatrics, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan 48072.

Doppler echocardiograms of the tricuspid and mitral valves were recorded along with the electrocardiogram and respiration in 22 normal full-term neonates. A computer-interfaced digitizer pad was utilized to measure the following: peak E and A velocities (cm/s); E and A areas (the components of the total velocity-time integral in the early passive period of ventricular filling [E] and the late active period of atrial emptying [A], respectively) and the 1/3 area fraction (or the proportion of filling in the first 1/3 of diastole). All of the variables of right (tricuspid) versus left (mitral) ventricular filling were significantly different on the 1st day of life. Respective values were peak E velocity (cm/s) 44.6 +/- 10.0 (tricuspid) versus 53.2 +/- 9.3 (mitral), p less than 0.01; peak E/A ratio 0.84 +/- 0.14 versus 1.15 +/- 0.17, p less than 0.0001; E/total area 0.58 +/- 0.07 versus 0.63 +/- 0.05, p less than 0.005; E/A area ratio 1.05 +/- 0.23 versus 1.63 +/- 0.40, p less than 0.0001; 1/3 area fraction 0.31 +/- 0.04 versus 0.41 +/- 0.04, p less than 0.0001; peak A velocity (cm/s) 53.0 +/- 8.4 versus 47.6 +/- 5.8, p less than 0.05 and A/total area 0.57 +/- 0.09 versus 0.41 +/- 0.09, p less than 0.001; the mean heart rate (beats/min) was not significantly different: 121 +/- 8 versus 120 +/- 7. Most of the variables remained significantly different on the 2nd day of life, but the level of significance was the same or less for all measurements.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
D Fugelseth, W B Borke, K Lenes, I Matthews, O D Saugstad, and E Thaulow
Restoration of cardiopulmonary function with 21% versus 100% oxygen after hypoxaemia in newborn pigs
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2005; 90(3): F229 - f234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
K Mori, R Nakagawa, M Nii, T Edagawa, Y Takehara, M Inoue, and Y Kuroda
Pulsed wave Doppler tissue echocardiography assessment of the long axis function of the right and left ventricles during the early neonatal period
Heart, February 1, 2004; 90(2): 175 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
S J Clark, C W Yoxall, and N V Subhedar
Measurement of right ventricular volume in healthy term and preterm neonates
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2002; 87(2): F89 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.