JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1989; 13:545-550
© 1989 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Otto, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Otto, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gardner, C.

Hemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis in adults assessed by Doppler echocardiography

CM Otto, AS Pearlman, and CL Gardner

Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

Doppler echocardiography was used to follow the hemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis. First, the reproducibility of repeat recordings (mean interval 28 +/- 36 days) of aortic jet velocity, made by two independent observers, was tested in 38 adults with aortic stenosis and unchanged clinical status. The two recordings of maximal velocity correlated well (r = 0.96, y = 0.88x + 0.46m/s, SEE = 0.21 m/s) with a mean coefficient of variation of 3.2%. Repeat recording of left ventricular outflow tract velocity by two independent observers in 10 other patients with aortic stenosis also correlated well (r = 0.94, y = 1.06x + 0.0 m/s, SEE = 0.06 m/s) with a mean coefficient of variation of 4.6%. Next, Doppler echocardiography was used to study 42 patients with aortic stenosis (mean age 66 years) over a follow-up interval of 6 to 43 months (mean 20). Maximal aortic jet velocity increased by 0.36 m/s per year (range -0.3 to +1.0 m/s per year). Mean transaortic pressure gradient changed by -7 to +23 (mean 8) mm Hg/year. Aortic valve area by the continuity equation (n = 25) decreased by 0 to 0.5 cm2/year (mean decrease 0.1 cm2/year). Some patients had a worsening of stenosis (decrease in valve area) even though they had no change or a decrease in pressure gradient, because of concurrent decreases in transaortic volume flow. Twenty-one patients (50%) developed new or progressive symptoms of aortic stenosis necessitating valve replacement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. M. Moura, S. F. Ramos, J. L. Zamorano, I. M. Barros, L. F. Azevedo, F. Rocha-Goncalves, and N. M. Rajamannan
Rosuvastatin Affecting Aortic Valve Endothelium to Slow the Progression of Aortic Stenosis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 6, 2007; 49(5): 554 - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): e1 - e148.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 598 - 675.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. V. Freeman and C. M. Otto
Spectrum of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Pathogenesis, Disease Progression, and Treatment Strategies
Circulation, June 21, 2005; 111(24): 3316 - 3326.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. Rosenhek
Statins for Aortic Stenosis
N. Engl. J. Med., June 9, 2005; 352(23): 2441 - 2443.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. T. Smith IV, T. B. Ferguson Jr, T. Ryan, C. K. Landolfo, and E. D. Peterson
Should coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients with mild or moderate aortic stenosis undergo concomitant aortic valve replacement?: A decision analysis approach to the surgical dilemma
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 15, 2004; 44(6): 1241 - 1247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Rosenhek, F. Rader, N. Loho, H. Gabriel, M. Heger, U. Klaar, M. Schemper, T. Binder, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner
Statins but Not Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Delay Progression of Aortic Stenosis
Circulation, September 7, 2004; 110(10): 1291 - 1295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R. Rosenhek, U. Klaar, M. Schemper, C. Scholten, M. Heger, H. Gabriel, T. Binder, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner
Mild and moderate aortic stenosis: Natural history and risk stratification by echocardiography
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2004; 25(3): 199 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
K.-L. Chan
Is aortic stenosis a preventable disease?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 20, 2003; 42(4): 593 - 599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Das, H. Rimington, N. Smeeton, and J. Chambers
Determinants of symptoms and exercise capacity in aortic stenosis: a comparison of resting haemodynamics and valve compliance during dobutamine stress
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2003; 24(13): 1254 - 1263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
N. M Rajamannan, B. Gersh, and R. O Bonow
CALCIFIC AORTIC STENOSIS: FROM BENCH TO THE BEDSIDE--EMERGING CLINICAL AND CELLULAR CONCEPTS
Heart, July 1, 2003; 89(7): 801 - 805.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Bermejo, R. Odreman, J. Feijoo, M. M. Moreno, P. Gomez-Moreno, and M. A. Garcia-Fernandez
Clinical efficacy of Doppler-echocardiographic indices of aortic valve stenosis:a comparative test-based analysis of outcome
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2003; 41(1): 142 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. F. Bellamy, P. A. Pellikka, K. W. Klarich, A. J. Tajik, and M. Enriquez-Sarano
Association of cholesterol levels, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme-a reductase inhibitor treatment, and progression of aortic stenosis in the community
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2002; 40(10): 1723 - 1730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. S. Pearlman
Medical treatment ofaortic stenosis: Promising, or wishful thinking?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2002; 40(10): 1731 - 1734.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. A. Carabello
Aortic Stenosis
N. Engl. J. Med., February 28, 2002; 346(9): 677 - 682.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J.-L. Monin, M. Monchi, V. Gest, A.-M. Duval-Moulin, J.-L. Dubois-Rande, and P. Gueret
Aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction and low transvalvular pressure gradients: Risk stratification by low-dose dobutamine echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2101 - 2107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. J. Lester, D. B. McElhinney, J. P. Miller, J. T. Lutz, C. M. Otto, and R. F. Redberg
Rate of Change in Aortic Valve Area During a Cardiac Cycle Can Predict the Rate of Hemodynamic Progression of Aortic Stenosis
Circulation, April 25, 2000; 101(16): 1947 - 1952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Enriquez-Sarano, A.-J. Basmadjian, A. Rossi, K. R. Bailey, J. B. Seward, and A. J. Tajik
Progression of mitral regurgitation: A prospective Doppler echocardiographic study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1137 - 1144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. M. Otto, B. K. Lind, D. W. Kitzman, B. J. Gersh, D. S. Siscovick, and The Cardiovascular Health Study
Association of Aortic-Valve Sclerosis with Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity in the Elderly
N. Engl. J. Med., July 15, 1999; 341(3): 142 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. A. Carabello and F. A. Crawford
Valvular Heart Disease
N. Engl. J. Med., July 3, 1997; 337(1): 32 - 41.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. M. Otto, I. G. Burwash, M. E. Legget, B. I. Munt, M. Fujioka, N. L. Healy, C. D. Kraft, C. Y. Miyake-Hull, and R. G. Schwaegler
Prospective Study of Asymptomatic Valvular Aortic Stenosis : Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Exercise Predictors of Outcome
Circulation, May 6, 1997; 95(9): 2262 - 2270.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. A. Odell, C. J. Mullany, H. V. Schaff, T. A. Orszulak, R. C. Daly, and J. J. Morris
Aortic Valve Replacement After Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1996; 62(5): 1424 - 1430.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
A. D. Waggoner, B. Barzilai, and J. E. Perez
Two-Dimensional Doppler Echocardiographic Derived Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1991; 7(2): 64 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
DOPPLER RELIABLE FOR FOLLOWING PROGRESSION OF AORTIC STENOSIS
Journal Watch (General), March 21, 1989; 1989(321): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.