The prognostic significance of quantitative signal-averaged variables relative to clinical variables, site of myocardial infarction, ejection fraction and ventricular premature beats: a prospective study

Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029.

A prospective study was undertaken of the prognostic significance of quantitative signal-averaged electrocardiographic (ECG) variables relative to clinical variables, site of myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction and characteristics of ventricular premature beats in 115 patients (mean age 62 +/- 12 years) studied 10 +/- 6 days after myocardial infarction. Signal-averaged variables included the root mean square voltage of the terminal 40 ms, the duration of the filtered signal-averaged QRS complex and low amplitude signals less than 40 microV determined at 25 and 40 Hz high pass filtering in all patients. Of the 115 patients, 51 (44%) had an abnormal signal-averaged ECG (one or more abnormal signal-averaged variables), 51 (44%) at 25 Hz and 48 (42%) at 40 Hz high pass filtering. A higher proportion of patients with an inferior wall infarction had an abnormal signal-averaged ECG as compared with patients with anterior wall infarction (58% versus 31%). Over a 14 +/- 8 month follow-up period 16 patients (14%) had an arrhythmic event. An abnormal signal-averaged ECG at 40 Hz high pass filtering had a higher sensitivity (81% versus 75%) and specificity (65% versus 61%) than at 25 Hz high pass filtering. The predictive value of the signal-averaged ECG was superior to that of the ejection fraction (40% versus 20%) in anterior wall myocardial infarction, whereas in patients with inferior wall infarction, the predictive values of the two tests were equivalent. The prognostic power of 27 clinical and noninvasive variables was determined with the Cox proportional hazards regression model.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. J. Bailey, M. Hodges, and T. R. Church Decision to Implant a Cardioverter Defibrillator after Myocardial Infarction: The Role of Ejection Fraction v. Other Risk Factor Markers Med Decis Making, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 151 - 160. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Raviele, M. G. Bongiorni, M. Brignole, R. Cappato, A. Capucci, F. Gaita, M. Gulizia, S. Mangiameli, A. S. Montenero, R. F. E. Pedretti, et al. Early EPS/ICD strategy in survivors of acute myocardial infarction with severe left ventricular dysfunction on optimal beta-blocker treatment: The BEta-blocker STrategy plus ICD trial Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(4): 327 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Hohnloser and B. J. Gersh Changing Late Prognosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Impact on Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias in the Era of Reperfusion and the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Circulation, February 25, 2003; 107(7): 941 - 946. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Kitamura, Y. Ohnishi, K. Okajima, A. Ishida, E. Galeano, K. Adachi, and M. Yokoyama Onset heart rate of microvolt-level T-wave alternans provides clinical and prognostic value in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2002; 39(2): 295 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Bailey, A. S. Berson, H. Handelsman, and M. Hodges Utility of current risk stratification tests for predicting major arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2001; 38(7): 1902 - 1911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. V. Huikuri, A. Castellanos, and R. J. Myerburg Sudden Death Due to Cardiac Arrhythmias N. Engl. J. Med., November 15, 2001; 345(20): 1473 - 1482. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Scharf, H. Redecker, F. Duru, R. Candinas, H. P. Brunner-La Rocca, A. Gerber, O. Bertel, M. I. Turina, and W. Kiowski Sudden cardiac death after coronary artery bypass grafting is not predicted by signal-averaged ECG Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2001; 72(5): 1546 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Brembilla-Perrot, C. Suty-Selton, P. Houriez, O. Claudon, D. Beurrier, and A. T. de la Chaise Value of non-invasive and invasive studies in patients with bundle branch block, syncope and history of myocardial infarction Europace, January 1, 2001; 3(3): 187 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A Nava, A.F Folino, B Bauce, P Turrini, G.F Buja, L Daliento, and G Thiene Signal-averaged electrocardiogram in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and ventricular arrhythmias Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2000; 21(1): 58 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.-P. Couderc, P. Chevalier, J. Fayn, P. Rubel, and P. Touboul Identification of post-myocardial infarction patients prone to ventricular tachycardia using time-frequency analysis of QRS and ST segments Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(2): 141 - 153. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. H. Crawford, S. J. Bernstein, P. C. Deedwania, J. P. DiMarco, K. J. Ferrick, A. Garson Jr, L. A. Green, H. L. Greene, M. J. Silka, P. H. Stone, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for ambulatory electrocardiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography) developed in collaboration with the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 912 - 948. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Adachi, Y. Ohnishi, T. Shima, K. Yamashiro, A. Takei, N. Tamura, and M. Yokoyama Determinant of microvolt-level T-wave alternans in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1999; 34(2): 374 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A A Armoundas, D S Rosenbaum, J N Ruskin, H Garan, and R J Cohen Prognostic significance of electrical alternans versus signal averaged electrocardiography in predicting the outcome of electrophysiological testing and arrhythmia-free survival Heart, September 1, 1998; 80(3): 251 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text]