cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1989; 13:291-296
© 1989 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teirstein, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hartzler, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teirstein, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hartzler, G.

Repeat coronary angioplasty: efficacy of a third angioplasty for a second restenosis

PS Teirstein, CA Hoover, RW Ligon, LV Giorgi, BD Rutherford, DR McConahay, WL Johnson, and GO Hartzler

Mid America Heart Institute, St. Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri.

To determine the efficacy of repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, 74 patients were studied who underwent a third angioplasty for a second restenosis of one coronary artery segment. The procedure was successful in 93% of patients. Procedural complications included emergency bypass surgery (three patients) and in-hospital death (two patients). At late follow-up (mean 18 months, range 7 to 49), 30 patients (43%) had a third restenosis treated with either a fourth angioplasty (16 patients), coronary bypass surgery (11 patients) or medical management (1 patient). Thirty-nine patients (57%) had no restenosis on the basis of follow-up angiography or absence of symptoms previously attributed to restenosis. Factors associated with a third restenosis included a shorter time interval (less than 3 months) between previous angioplasty procedures and dilation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Among the 16 patients undergoing a fourth angioplasty for a third restenosis, the procedural success rate was 94%. One patient required emergency bypass surgery. At late follow-up (mean 16 months, range 7 to 38), eight patients (53%) had a fourth restenosis treated with either a fifth angioplasty (one patient), bypass surgery (five patients) or medical management (two patients). Considering all 74 patients undergoing a third angioplasty for a second restenosis, 27% had bypass surgery, 5% died, 4% were managed medically and 64% were free of angina at late follow-up after either a third, fourth or fifth angioplasty. Restenosis rates after a third or fourth angioplasty procedure for recurrent restenosis are higher than those for the initial procedures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. C. Smith Jr, J. T. Dove, A. K. Jacobs, J. Ward Kennedy, D. Kereiakes, M. J. Kern, R. E. Kuntz, J. J. Popma, H. V. Schaff, D. O. Williams, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines): A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2239 - 2239.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. S. Teirstein, V. Massullo, S. Jani, J. J. Popma, G. S. Mintz, R. J. Russo, R. A. Schatz, E. M. Guarneri, S. Steuterman, N. B. Morris, et al.
Catheter-Based Radiotherapy to Inhibit Restenosis after Coronary Stenting
N. Engl. J. Med., June 12, 1997; 336(24): 1697 - 1703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home