JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1989; 13:207-214
© 1989 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tang, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tang, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, R.

Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: the importance of phasic duration

AS Tang, S Yabe, JM Wharton, M Dolker, WM Smith, and RE Ideker

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

Biphasic waveforms can be used to defibrillate the heart with less energy than that used by monophasic waveforms. In 14 anesthetized open chest dogs with large contoured defibrillation electrodes, the effect on defibrillation efficacy of varying the duration of the two phases of biphasic waveforms was studied. All combinations of 0, 1, 3.5, 6 and 8.5 ms duration were used for both the first and the second phase except for the meaningless case in which both durations were 0 ms. The 3.5-2 waveform (3.5 ms first phase and 2 ms second phase) was also tested. All the hearts were defibrillated with less than or equal to 5 joules using any of the 25 waveforms. However, biphasic waveforms with the second phase shorter than or equal to the first had significantly lower defibrillation thresholds than did those with the second phase longer than the first or than did monophasic waveforms of approximately the same total duration. A plot of defibrillation threshold current strength versus second phase duration for all biphasic waveforms with a 3.5 ms first phase did not produce a hyperbolic strength-duration curve as seen with monophasic waveforms. To verify these findings, defibrillation dose-response curves were obtained for the 3.5-2, 6-6 and 3.5-8.5 biphasic waveforms in another six dogs. The 50 and 80% successful voltage doses of the 3.5-8.5 waveforms were significantly higher than those of the other two waveforms, which were not different from one another.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Y. Zhang, R. S. Ramabadran, K. A. Boddicker, I. Bawaney, L. R. Davies, M. B. Zimmerman, S. Wuthrich, J. L. Jones, and R. E. Kerber
Triphasic waveforms are superior to biphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation: Experimental studies
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 6, 2003; 42(3): 568 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. R. Shorofsky and M. R. Gold
Effect of Second-Phase Duration on the Strength-Duration Relation for Human Transvenous Defibrillation
Circulation, October 31, 2000; 102(18): 2239 - 2242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Mittal, S. Ayati, K. M. Stein, B. P. Knight, F. Morady, D. Schwartzman, D. Cavlovich, E. V. Platia, H. Calkins, P. J. Tchou, et al.
Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1595 - 1601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. N. Schauerte, K. Ziegert, M. Waldmann, F. A. Schondube, F. Birkenhauer, K. Mischke, M. Grossmann, P. Hanrath, and C. Stellbrink
Effect of Biphasic Shock Duration on Defibrillation Threshold With Different Electrode Configurations and Phase 2 Capacitances : Prediction by Upper-Limit-of-Vulnerability Determination
Circulation, March 23, 1999; 99(11): 1516 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. A. Pagan-Carlo, J. J. Allan, K. T. Spencer, C. L. Birkett, R. Myers, and R. E. Kerber
Encircling overlapping multipulse shock waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1998; 32(7): 2065 - 2071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Schauerte, F. A. Schondube, M. Grossmann, H. Dorge, F. Stein, B. Dohmen, A. Moumen, K. Erena, B. J. Messmer, P. Hanrath, et al.
Influence of Phase Duration of Biphasic Waveforms on Defibrillation Energy Requirements With a 70-µF Capacitance
Circulation, May 26, 1998; 97(20): 2073 - 2078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. J. Niebauer, B. Wilkoff, Y. Yamanouchi, T. Mazgalev, K. Mowrey, and P. Tchou
Iridium Oxide–Coated Defibrillation Electrode : Reduced Shock Polarization and Improved Defibrillation Efficacy
Circulation, November 18, 1997; 96(10): 3732 - 3736.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. D. Swerdlow, J. E. Brewer, R. M. Kass, and M. W. Kroll
Application of Models of Defibrillation to Human Defibrillation Data : Implications for Optimizing Implantable Defibrillator Capacitance
Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 2813 - 2822.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Tomassoni, K. Newby, S. Deshpande, K. Axtell, J. Sra, M. Akhtar, and A. Natale
Defibrillation Efficacy of Commercially Available Biphasic Impulses in Humans : Importance of Negative-Phase Peak Voltage
Circulation, April 1, 1997; 95(7): 1822 - 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. A. S. Cooper, E. E. Johnson, and J. M. Wharton
Internal Atrial Defibrillation in Humans : Improved Efficacy of Biphasic Waveforms and the Importance of Phase Duration
Circulation, March 18, 1997; 95(6): 1487 - 1496.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. D. Swerdlow, W. Fan, and J. E. Brewer
Charge-Burping Theory Correctly Predicts Optimal Ratios of Phase Duration for Biphasic Defibrillation Waveforms
Circulation, November 1, 1996; 94(9): 2278 - 2284.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Behrens, C. Li, P. Kirchhof, F. L. Fabritz, and M. R. Franz
Reduced Arrhythmogenicity of Biphasic Versus Monophasic T-Wave Shocks: Implications for Defibrillation Efficacy
Circulation, October 15, 1996; 94(8): 1974 - 1980.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Yamanouchi, K. A. Mowrey, G. R. Nadzam, D. G. Hills, M. W. Kroll, J. E. Brewer, A. M. Donohoo, B. L. Wilkoff, and P. J. Tchou
Large Change in Voltage at Phase Reversal Improves Biphasic Defibrillation Thresholds: Parallel-Series Mode Switching
Circulation, October 1, 1996; 94(7): 1768 - 1773.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. U. Alt, P. C. Fotuhi, R. L. Callihan, E. Mestre, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
Endocardial Carbon-Braid Electrodes : A New Concept for Lower Defibrillation Thresholds
Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1627 - 1633.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. E. Gliner, T. E. Lyster, S. M. Dillion, and G. H. Bardy
Transthoracic Defibrillation of Swine With Monophasic and Biphasic Waveforms
Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1634 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. U. Alt, P. C. Fotuhi, R. L. Callihan, D. L. Rollins, E. Mestre, M. P. Combs, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
Improved Defibrillation Threshold With a New Epicardial Carbon Electrode Compared With a Standard Epicardial Titanium Patch
Circulation, January 15, 1995; 91(2): 445 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1989 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.