cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1988; 12:1265-1272
© 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirsh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Swiryn, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirsh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Swiryn, S

Ventricular response to atrial fibrillation: role of atrioventricular conduction pathways

JA Kirsh, AV Sahakian, JM Baerman, and S Swiryn

Department of Biomedical, Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

Irregularity of the ventricular rhythm is a hallmark of patients with atrial fibrillation, yet the genesis of the irregularity is not yet fully understood. The role of the atrioventricular (AV) node in determining the irregularity of the ventricular response to atrial fibrillation was investigated by comparing the frequency distributions of the atrial (AA) and the ventricular (RR) intervals. Atrial electrograms and surface electrocardiographic leads were recorded during sustained atrial fibrillation in 12 patients with conduction over the AV node. The scaling factor (mean RR interval/mean AA interval) quantified the ability of the conduction pathway to scale the atrial input to a slower ventricular response and ranged from 2.55 to 5.92 (mean +/- SD 3.77 +/- 0.92). The coefficient of variation (SD/mean) measured the relative variability of the AA and RR interval distributions. The atrial and ventricular coefficients of variation were not significantly different (0.20 +/- 0.04 versus 0.21 +/- 0.03, p greater than 0.27). Similar recordings were analyzed in six patients with conduction over a accessory AV pathway. The scaling factor ranged from 1.54 to 2.46 (2.02 +/- 0.39) and, as was the case for patients with conduction over the AV node, the atrial and ventricular coefficients of variation did not significantly differ (0.24 +/- 0.08 versus 0.27 +/- 0.10, p greater than 0.6). For both groups of patients, ventricular variability and the maximal RR intervals were predicted by the product of the scaling factor and either atrial variability or maximal AA intervals, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. J Workman, K. A Kane, and A. C Rankin
The contribution of ionic currents to changes in refractoriness of human atrial myocytes associated with chronic atrial fibrillation
Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2001; 52(2): 226 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Hayano, F. Yamasaki, S. Sakata, A. Okada, S. Mukai, and T. Fujinami
Spectral characteristics of ventricular response to atrial fibrillation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 1997; 273(6): H2811 - H2816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home