Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1988; 12:519-525
© 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sherry, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sherry, S

Unresolved clinical pharmacologic questions in thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction

S Sherry

Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140.

Thrombolytic therapy has now become established as a useful therapeutic measure for the immediate treatment of an acute evolving transmural infarction. Nevertheless, several important and fundamental aspects of a pharmacologic nature remain to be resolved. Prominent among these is whether or not fibrin specificity of a thrombolytic agent provides important benefits, and whether heparin therapy as commonly employed to prevent rethrombosis has been effective. Review of the available data raises serious questions as to the validity of current views and the appropriateness of prevailing trends.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & RehabilitationHome page
E. Geraci and G. Tognoni
The Open Infarct-Related Artery Theory: A Critical View
European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, December 1, 1994; 1(4): 301 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement