JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1988; 12:470-475
© 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, M.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cooper, M.
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, N.

Evaluation of the responsiveness of elevated pulmonary vascular resistance in children by Doppler echocardiography

MJ Cooper, M Tyndall, and NH Silverman

Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco 94143.

Changes in the Doppler indexes, acceleration time (AcT), right ventricular ejection time (RVET), AcT/RVET ratio and pulmonary artery peak velocity were measured as were changes in pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance in 21 children with pulmonary hypertension due to a large interventricular communication. In 11 children pulmonary vascular resistance was greater than 4.6 U/m2 (mean 8.6 +/- 1.6), whereas in 10 it was less than 4.5 U/m2 (mean 3.4 +/- 0.2). Although both groups demonstrated acceleration time and AcT/RVET values above normal, there were no significant differences in these values between the groups with high and low pulmonary vascular resistance. With administration of a pulmonary vasodilator pulmonary vascular resistance decreased in 11 responders by greater than 50% of baseline values (from 5.3 +/- 0.7 to 1.6 +/- 0.3 U/m2), whereas in the 10 nonresponders mean pulmonary vascular resistance decreased from 7.0 +/- 1.9 to 4.9 +/- 1.1 U/m2. There was no significant change in the Doppler indexes except for an increase in pulmonary artery peak velocity in the responders from 1.34 +/- 0.07 to 1.66 +/- 0.06 m/s (p less than 0.001). The results indicate that Doppler echocardiography cannot predict either the level of increased pulmonary vascular resistance or the degree of responsiveness sufficiently to obviate the need for cardiac catheterization in patients with interventricular communication and pulmonary hypertension.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
P. M. Mourani, M. K. Sontag, A. Younoszai, D. D. Ivy, and S. H. Abman
Clinical Utility of Echocardiography for the Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Vascular Disease in Young Children With Chronic Lung Disease
Pediatrics, February 1, 2008; 121(2): 317 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. McGoon, D. Gutterman, V. Steen, R. Barst, D. C. McCrory, T. A. Fortin, and J. E. Loyd
Screening, Early Detection, and Diagnosis of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chest, July 1, 2004; 126(1_suppl): 14S - 34S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.