JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1988; 12:315-323
© 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beatt, K.
Right arrow Articles by Serruys, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beatt, K.
Right arrow Articles by Serruys, P.

Change in diameter of coronary artery segments adjacent to stenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: failure of percent diameter stenosis measurement to reflect morphologic changes induced by balloon dilation

KJ Beatt, HE Luijten, PJ de Feyter, M van den Brand, JH Reiber, and PW Serruys

Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

To determine the changes in stenotic and nonstenotic segments of a dilated coronary artery, detailed quantitative angiographic measurements were performed in 342 patients (398 lesions) immediately after angioplasty and at a predetermined follow-up time of 30, 60, 90 or 120 days after the dilation. Measurements of the stenotic segments were expressed as minimal luminal diameter, and the adjacent nonstenotic segments were expressed as interpolated reference diameter (both in millimeters). A follow-up rate of 86% was achieved. In the patients followed up at 30 and 60 days, there was no significant change in either the mean minimal luminal diameter or the mean reference diameter. However, at 90 and 120 days, there was significant deterioration in both the mean minimal luminal diameter (-0.37 and -0.42 mm, respectively) and the mean reference diameter (-0.17 and -0.26 mm, respectively), all of the changes being highly significant (p less than 0.00001). The reference diameter is involved in the dilation process and may be subject to the same restenosis process that takes place in initially stenotic segments. Percent diameter stenosis measurements, which are conventionally used to express the change in the severity of a stenosis after angioplasty, will tend to underestimate the change when there is a simultaneous reduction in the reference diameter.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. A. Lemos, N. Mercado, R. T. van Domburg, R. E. Kuntz, W. W. O'Neill, and P. W. Serruys
Comparison of Late Luminal Loss Response Pattern After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation or Conventional Stenting
Circulation, November 16, 2004; 110(20): 3199 - 3205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Sabate, M. A. Costa, K. Kozuma, I. P. Kay, C. J. van der Wiel, V. Verin, W. Wijns, P. W. Serruys, and on behalf of the Dose Finding Study Group
Methodological and clinical implications of the relocation of the minimal luminal diameter after intracoronary radiation therapy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 2000; 36(5): 1536 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. J. Lansky, G. S. Mintz, J. J. Popma, A. D. Pichard, K. M. Kent, L. F. Satler, D. S. Baim, R. E. Kuntz, C. Simonton, R. M. Bersin, et al.
Remodeling after directional coronary atherectomy (with and without adjunct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty): a serial angiographic and intravascular ultrasound analysis from the optimal atherectomy restenosis study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1998; 32(2): 329 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. Keane, J. Haase, C. J. Slager, E. M. van Swijndregt, K. G. Lehmann, Y. Ozaki, C. di Mario, R. Kirkeeide, and P. W. Serruys
Comparative Validation of Quantitative Coronary Angiography Systems : Results and Implications From a Multicenter Study Using a Standardized Approach
Circulation, April 15, 1995; 91(8): 2174 - 2183.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.