JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1988; 12:1-7
© 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanford, W
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stanford, W
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M.

Sensitivity and specificity of assessing coronary bypass graft patency with ultrafast computed tomography: results of a multicenter study

W Stanford, BH Brundage, R MacMillan, EV Chomka, TM Bateman, WJ Eldredge, MJ Lipton, CW White, RF Wilson, MR Johnson, et al.

Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City.

Because a significant number of all patients seen by cardiologists have had coronary bypass surgery, a relatively noninvasive method of assessing coronary bypass graft patency would be very helpful. Ultrafast computed tomography, by virtue of its rapid data acquisition time and reasonable spatial resolution, may be useful in this regard. To determine the sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy of this imaging modality as compared with cardiac catheterization, a multicenter study was undertaken. There were two parts to the study. Part I involved the evaluation of 179 grafts in 74 patients studied in the five participating centers between March 1985 and August 1986. Twenty-nine percent of these graft studies were found to be technically inadequate and were excluded before patency determinations began. The remaining group of 127 bypass grafts in 62 patients had studies adequate for interpretation. Fifty-one grafts were to the left anterior descending coronary artery or a diagonal branch, 37 to branches of the left circumflex artery and 28 to the right coronary artery or a posterior descending vessel; in addition, there were 11 internal mammary artery bypass grafts primarily into the left anterior descending or diagonal artery distribution. The sensitivity of detecting angiographically open grafts was 93.4%, the specificity of detecting angiographically closed grafts 88.9% and the predictive accuracy was 92.1%. A subsequent study (Part 2) was performed 9 months later to assess the ability to carry out technically adequate examinations. Of the 138 consecutive graft examinations (50 patients) included in this part of the study, 94.2% of the examinations were found to be technically adequate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Malagutti, K. Nieman, W. B. Meijboom, C. A.G. van Mieghem, F. Pugliese, F. Cademartiri, N. R. Mollet, E. Boersma, P. P. de Jaegere, and P. J. de Feyter
Use of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after coronary bypass surgery: evaluation of grafts and coronary arteries
Eur. Heart J., August 1, 2007; 28(15): 1879 - 1885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. J. Budoff, S. Achenbach, R. S. Blumenthal, J. J. Carr, J. G. Goldin, P. Greenland, A. D. Guerci, J. A.C. Lima, D. J. Rader, G. D. Rubin, et al.
Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology
Circulation, October 17, 2006; 114(16): 1761 - 1791.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
M. Dietrich, S. Martens, M. Kohlert, C. Herzog, M. F. Khan, G. Wimmer-Greinecker, and A. Moritz
Decreased intermediate term patency of automated proximal anastomoses evaluated by sequential ultrafast CT
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 27(4): 579 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P.J. de Feyter and K. Nieman
Noninvasive multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: An emerging clinical modality
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 15, 2004; 44(6): 1238 - 1240.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Nieman, P. M. T. Pattynama, B. J. Rensing, R.-J. M. van Geuns, and P. J. de Feyter
Evaluation of Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: CT Angiographic Assessment of Grafts and Coronary Arteries
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 749 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
K.-J. Yoo, D. Choi, B. W. Choi, S.-H. Lim, and B.-C. Chang
The comparison of the graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting using coronary angiography and multi-slice computed tomography
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 24(1): 86 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Pump, S. Möhlenkamp, C. A. Sehnert, S. S. Schimpf, A. Schmidt, R. Erbel, D. H. W. Grönemeyer, and R. M. M. Seibel
Coronary Arterial Stent Patency: Assessment with Electron-Beam CT
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 447 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. H. Lemmer Jr., W. Stanford, S. L. Bonney, J. F. Breen, E. V. Chomka, W. J. Eldredge, W. W. Holt, R. B. Karp, G. W. Laub, M. J. Lipton, et al.
Aprotinin for coronary bypass operations: Efficacy, safety, and influence on early saphenous vein graft patencyA multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 1994; 107(2): 543 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.