JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1988; 11:1245-1253
© 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruder, M.
Right arrow Articles by Winkle, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ruder, M.
Right arrow Articles by Winkle, R.

Transvenous catheter ablation of extranodal accessory pathways

MA Ruder, RH Mead, V Gaudiani, WS Buch, NA Smith, and RA Winkle

Department of Cardiology, Sequoia Hospital, Redwood City, California.

Twelve patients with an accessory pathway and recurrent symptomatic reciprocating tachycardia or atrial fibrillation, or both, underwent attempted transvenous catheter ablation of the accessory pathway. In one patient with a small right coronary artery, the pathway was along the right free wall. In 11 patients, the pathway was located at or within 15 mm of the coronary sinus os. For these patients, a quadripolar electrode catheter was placed in the coronary sinus and positioned, if possible, so that the proximal pair of electrodes straddled the pathway. For those patients with a pathway greater than 5 mm within the coronary sinus, the most proximal electrode was placed at the os. This proximal pair of electrodes was connected to the cathodal output of a defibrillator with an anterior chest wall patch serving as the current sink. Two shocks were then delivered for a cumulative energy of 500 to 600 J (stored energy). Among the eight patients with a pathway at or within 5 mm of the coronary sinus os, conduction over the pathway was abolished in five and modified in one. Among the four patients with a pathway farther from the os (10 to 15 mm) and along the right free wall, pathway conduction was modified only in two. Rupture of the coronary sinus did not occur in any patient. There were no serious complications. Minor damage surrounding the area of ablation was seen at the time of surgical division of the accessory pathway in two of five patients with unsuccessful ablation who subsequently underwent surgery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.