JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1988; 11:806-813
© 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frohlig, G
Right arrow Articles by Bette, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frohlig, G
Right arrow Articles by Bette, L

Atrial signal variations and pacemaker malsensing during exercise: a study in the time and frequency domain

G Frohlig, H Schwerdt, H Schieffer, and L Bette

Medizinische Universitatsklinik, Innere Medizin III, Homburg, West Germany.

To give some explanation for atrial malsensing in dual chamber pacing that occurs only during exercise, atrial electrograms from 33 patients were telemetrically recorded and analyzed in both the time and frequency domains. During exercise, an overall decrease from 6.4 +/- 1.9 to 5.6 +/- 1.9 mV (-11%) in the atrial signal amplitude was noted. Despite considerable variability among patients, marked changes occurred in 15 patients whose signals diminished by 11 to 49%. Slew rates showed a similar decrease from 1.35 +/- 0.45 to 1.18 +/- 0.45 V/s (-10.8%), with individual changes of as much as -51%. Signal attenuation in the time domain correlated well with frequency data, exhibiting a highly significant reduction of signal energy between 25 and 105 Hz. However, spectral distribution changed from rest to exercise, with a relative increase of signal energy in the range between 5 and 25 Hz and a decrease at higher frequencies. Individual changes differed widely when low (15 to 65 Hz) and high (65 to 115 Hz) frequencies were compared, but in a group of 11 patients signal attenuation in the high frequency band was more pronounced (-45%) than in the low frequency band (-23%). The clinical impact of the change in frequency distribution during ergometry was visualized by computer simulation of two different (low and high bandpass) filters. Although in individual patients, both characteristics may be favorable with respect to atrial sensing, it was observed in 11 patients that high pass filtering attenuates signal amplitudes by 10 to 24% in excess of the variation without filtering.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.