JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1988; 11:698-705
© 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simonton, C.
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simonton, C.
Right arrow Articles by O'Connor, C

Late restenosis after emergent coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: comparison with elective coronary angioplasty

CA Simonton, DB Mark, T Hinohara, DS Rendall, HR Phillips, RH Peter, VS Behar, Y Kong, WG O'Callaghan, C O'Connor, et al.

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

The late restenosis rate after emergent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction was assessed by performing outpatient follow-up cardiac catheterization in 79 (87%) of 91 consecutive patients who had been discharged from the hospital with a successful coronary angioplasty. The majority of patients (90%) received high dose intravenous thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase in addition to angioplasty. Similar follow-up data were obtained in 206 (90%) of 228 consecutive patients who had successful elective angioplasty during the same period. The interval from angioplasty to follow-up was 28 +/- 9 weeks for the myocardial infarction group and 30 +/- 11 weeks for the elective group. Baseline clinical variables were similar for both the myocardial infarction and elective groups except for a higher percentage of men in the infarction group (81 versus 63%, p = 0.001). The number of coronary lesions undergoing angioplasty and the incidence of intimal dissection were similar, but multivessel angioplasty was more common in the elective group (13 versus 4%, p = 0.02). The rate of in-hospital reocclusion was higher in the patients receiving angioplasty for myocardial infarction (13 versus 2%, p = 0.0001). At the time of late follow-up after hospital discharge, the patients with myocardial infarction were more often asymptomatic (79 versus 55%, p = 0.0001), and the rate of angiographic coronary restenosis was lower for the infarction group both overall (19 versus 35%, p = 0.006) and when multivessel angioplasty patients were excluded (19 versus 33%, p = 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. J. Brener, L. A. Barr, J. E. B. Burchenal, S. Katz, B. S. George, A. A. Jones, E. D. Cohen, P. C. Gainey, H. J. White, H. B. Cheek, et al.
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade With Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Circulation, August 25, 1998; 98(8): 734 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Bauters, P. Khanoyan, E. P. Mc Fadden, P. Quandalle, J.-M. Lablanche, and M. E. Bertrand
Restenosis After Delayed Coronary Angioplasty of the Culprit Vessel in Patients With a Recent Myocardial Infarction Treated by Thrombolysis
Circulation, March 1, 1995; 91(5): 1410 - 1418.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.