Comparison of defibrillation efficacy in humans using a new catheter and superior vena cava spring-left ventricular patch electrodes

Division of Cardiology, Sequoia Hospital District, Redwood City.

The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator currently utilizes an electrode system that requires a major operation for implantation. Effective defibrillation using an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator catheter positioned transvenously would eliminate the morbidity associated with such surgery. Fifteen patients undergoing defibrillator implantation were studied to compare the efficacy of the catheter with that of the superior vena cava spring (6.7 cm2, anode)-left ventricular patch (13.5 cm2, cathode) electrode system using truncated exponential waveforms with 60% tilt. The catheter is 11F in diameter and tripolar. A distal platinum-iridium tip used for pacing was separated by 4 mm from a middle 4.3 cm2 platinum electrode; these were positioned at the right ventricular apex. The proximal 8.5 cm2 platinum electrode was situated at the superior vena cava-right atrial junction. Defibrillation was performed using the middle (cathode) and proximal (anode) electrodes. Ventricular fibrillation was induced by alternating current six times, and defibrillation shocks of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20 or 25 J were given in random order, first using the catheter and then the spring-patch system. Rescue shocks of higher energy were given if there was failure. Although very low energy levels appeared to be slightly more efficacious when using the spring-patch system, there was no statistically significant difference between the electrode systems for any of the energies tested. Permanent implantation of the catheter would have been suitable in 45% of the patients, as compared with 54% of patients with the spring-patch system (p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. A.M.J. Theuns, T. Szili-Torok, and L. J. Jordaens Defibrillation efficacy testing: Long-term follow-up and mortality Europace, January 1, 2005; 7(6): 509 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Winter, J. E. Heil, C. Schumann, Y. Lin, C. M. Schannwell, U. Michel, J. D. Schipke, H. D. Schulte, and E. Gams Effect of implantable cardioverter/defibrillator lead placement in the right ventricle on defibrillation energy requirements. A combined experimental and clinical study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 1999; 14(4): 419 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. Fotuhi, R. E. Ideker, S. F. Idriss, R. L. Callihan, R. G. Walker, and E. U. Alt Influence of Epicardial Patches on Defibrillation Threshold With Nonthoracotomy Lead Configurations Circulation, November 15, 1995; 92(10): 3082 - 3088. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. U. Alt, P. C. Fotuhi, R. L. Callihan, E. Mestre, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker Endocardial Carbon-Braid Electrodes : A New Concept for Lower Defibrillation Thresholds Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1627 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. L. Pinski and G. J. Fahy The Proarrhythmic Potential of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Circulation, September 15, 1995; 92(6): 1651 - 1664. [Abstract] [Full Text]