cardiology careers collections past issues search home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1988; 11:343-350
© 1988 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Zuttere, D
Right arrow Articles by Prasquier, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by de Zuttere, D
Right arrow Articles by Prasquier, R

Doppler echocardiographic measurement of mitral flow volume: validation of a new method in adult patients

D de Zuttere, T Touche, G Saumon, A Nitenberg, and R Prasquier

INSERM U.251, Service d'Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hopital Bichat, Paris, France.

Instantaneous intracardiac flow volumes can be calculated as the product of instantaneous flow velocity and instantaneous orifice area. This was accounted for in a new method of measuring stroke volume and cardiac output in the mitral orifice by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. This method was compared with simultaneous thermodilution in 30 adult patients in sinus rhythm without substantial atrioventricular or pulmonary valve abnormalities. The mitral orifice was assimilated to a conduit with 1) an ellipse-shaped inlet and outlet, 2) the same (and constant) long axis for the inlet and outlet ellipses (that is, the mediolateral anulus diameter measured on apical four chamber views), and 3) a varying outlet short axis (that is, the mitral anteroposterior leaflet separation derived from left parasternal M-mode recordings). This method design avoided the need for a short-axis view of the whole circumference of the mitral outlet orifice, which is difficult to obtain in many adult patients. The mitral flow velocity was recorded from the apex under two-dimensional guidance, within the mitral canal, close to the outlet section. Integration of instantaneous mitral leaflet separation multiplied by instantaneous flow velocity was performed using Simpson's rule. In addition to the proposed "instantaneous orifice area" method (method A), a "mean orifice area" method (method B) was also compared with thermodilution. In this simplified method, mitral flow was the product of mean orifice area and the diastolic mitral velocity integral, both derived from the same recordings as for method A.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)




 
  cardiology careers collections past issues search home