Differences between patients with ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation as assessed by signal-averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiac mapping
AR Denniss,
DL Ross,
DA Richards,
LK Holley,
MJ Cooper,
DC Johnson,
and
JB Uther
Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Australia.
This study examined 65 patients with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation late after myocardial infarction to determine whether they differed with respect to duration of ventricular activation in sinus rhythm and left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with spontaneous ventricular tachycardia had a longer ventricular activation time in sinus rhythm than did patients with spontaneous ventricular fibrillation. This difference was detected with the signal-averaged electrocardiogram (ECG) (tachycardia 181 +/- 33 ms, fibrillation 152 +/- 23 ms, p less than 0.001) and at epicardial mapping (tachycardia 210 +/- 17 ms, fibrillation 192 +/- 17 ms, p less than 0.02). Left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in patients with spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (0.22 +/- 0.09) than in patients with spontaneous ventricular fibrillation (0.27 +/- 0.09) (p less than 0.05). The patients with both spontaneous and inducible ventricular fibrillation had a shorter ventricular activation time on the signal-averaged ECG (129 +/- 17 ms) and a higher ejection fraction (0.36 +/- 0.05) than did either patients with spontaneous ventricular fibrillation and inducible ventricular tachycardia (158 +/- 21 ms and 0.25 +/- 0.08, respectively, each p less than 0.01) or patients with both spontaneous and inducible ventricular tachycardia (181 +/- 33 ms and 0.22 +/- 0.09, respectively, each p less than 0.001). Of the patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia, presentation with tachycardia rather than fibrillation was associated with a longer ventricular activation time on the signal-averaged ECG (181 +/- 33 versus 158 +/- 21 ms, p less than 0.02) and a longer cycle length of inducible ventricular tachycardia (290 +/- 61 versus 259 +/- 44 ms, p = 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
D. Mehta, J. Curwin, J. A. Gomes, and V. Fuster
Sudden Death in Coronary Artery Disease : Acute Ischemia Versus Myocardial Substrate
Circulation,
November 4, 1997;
96(9):
3215 - 3223.
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Savard, J.-L. Rouleau, J. Ferguson, N. Poitras, P. Morel, R. F. Davies, D. J. Stewart, M. Talajic, M. Gardner, R. Dupuis, et al.
Risk Stratification After Myocardial Infarction Using Signal-Averaged Electrocardiographic Criteria Adjusted for Sex, Age, and Myocardial Infarction Location
Circulation,
July 1, 1997;
96(1):
202 - 213.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R. R. Misier, T. Opthof, N. M. van Hemel, J. T. Vermeulen, J. M.T. de Bakker, J. J.A.M. Defauw, F. J.L. van Capelle, and M. J. Janse
Dispersion of `Refractoriness' in Noninfarcted Myocardium of Patients With Ventricular Tachycardia or Ventricular Fibrillation After Myocardial Infarction
Circulation,
May 15, 1995;
91(10):
2566 - 2572.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
