Comparison of predictions based on observational data with the results of randomized controlled clinical trials of coronary artery bypass surgery

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

Clinical decisions are most secure when based on findings from several large randomized clinical trials, but relevant randomized trial data are often unavailable. Analyses using clinical data bases might provide useful information if statistical methods can adequately correct for the lack of randomization. To test this approach, the findings of the three major randomized trials of coronary bypass surgery were compared with predictions of multivariable statistical models derived from observations in the Duke Cardiovascular Disease Databank. Clinical characteristics of patients at Duke University Medical Center who met eligibility requirements for each major randomized trial were used in the models to predict 5 year survival rates expected for medical and surgical therapy in each randomized trial. Model predictions agreed well with randomized trial results and were within the 95% confidence limits of the observed survival rates in 24 (92%) of 26 clinical subgroups. The overall correlation between predicted and observed survival rates was good (Spearman coefficient 0.73, p less than 0.0001). These results suggest that carefully performed analyses of observational data can complement the results of randomized trials.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. B. Mark, F. J. Van de Werf, R. J. Simes, H. D. White, L. C. Wallentin, R. M. Califf, P. W. Armstrong, and for the VIGOUR Group Cardiovascular disease on a global scale: defining the path forward for research and practice Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2007; 28(21): 2678 - 2684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. K. Smith, R. M. Califf, R. H. Tuttle, L. K. Shaw, K. L. Lee, E. R. Delong, R. E. Lilly, M. H. Sketch Jr, E. D. Peterson, and R. H. Jones Selection of surgical or percutaneous coronary intervention provides differential longevity benefit. Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 82(4): 1420 - 1429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Rankin and F. E. Harrell Jr Measuring the therapeutic efficacy of coronary revascularization: Implications for future management J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2006; 131(5): 944 - 948. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.A. C. Delaney The best type of trial Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 8, 2004; 170(12): 1772 - 1772. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sachdev, J. L. Sun, A. A. Tsiatis, C. L. Nelson, D. B. Mark, and J. G. Jollis The prognostic importance of comorbidity for mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 18, 2004; 43(4): 576 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. David, J. Ivanov, S. Armstrong, and H. Rakowski Reply to the Editor J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2003; 126(6): 2118 - 2119. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Hachamovitch, S. W. Hayes, J. D. Friedman, I. Cohen, and D. S. Berman Comparison of the Short-Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Circulation, June 17, 2003; 107(23): 2900 - 2907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P J Bradshaw, K Jamrozik, M Le, I Gilfillan, and P L Thompson Mortality and recurrent cardiac events after coronary artery bypass graft: long term outcomes in a population study Heart, December 1, 2002; 88(5): 488 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Ray Evidence in Upheaval: Incorporating Observational Data Into Clinical Practice Arch Intern Med, February 11, 2002; 162(3): 249 - 254. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Benson and A. J. Hartz A Comparison of Observational Studies and Randomized, Controlled Trials N. Engl. J. Med., June 22, 2000; 342(25): 1878 - 1886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Adetugbo and H. Williams How Well Are Randomized Controlled Trials Reported in the Dermatology Literature? Arch Dermatol, March 1, 2000; 136(3): 381 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Th. Budde, M. Haude, H.W. Hopp, S. Kerber, G. Caspari, G. Fassbender, M. Fingerhut, I. Novopashenny, Y. Ogurol, G. Breithardt, et al. A prognostic computer model to individually predict post-procedural complications in interventional cardiology; the INTERVENT Project Eur. Heart J., March 1, 1999; 20(5): 354 - 363. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Hoenig, R. Sloane, R. Horner, L. V. Rubenstein, and K. Kahn Hip Fracture Rehabilitation Arch Intern Med, January 12, 1998; 158(1): 100 - 101. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Black Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care BMJ, May 11, 1996; 312(7040): 1215 - 1218. [Full Text]

				A. J. Hartz, E. M. Kuhn, K. L. Kayser, and W. D. Johnson BUN as a Risk Factor for Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1995; 60(2): 398 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. J Sowden, J. J Deeks, and T. A Sheldon Volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: true association or artefact? BMJ, July 15, 1995; 311(6998): 151 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. T. Gray, D. C. Fyler, A. M. Walker, M. C. Weinstein, T. C. Chalmers, and The Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure Comparative S Clinical Outcomes and Costs of Transcatheter as Compared with Surgical Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus N. Engl. J. Med., November 18, 1993; 329(21): 1517 - 1523. [Abstract] [Full Text]