Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1987; 10:1259-1264
© 1987 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, W.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, W.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, J

Automatic external defibrillators: importance of field testing to evaluate performance

WD Weaver, DL Hill, C Fahrenbruch, LA Cobb, MK Copass, AP Hallstrom, and J Martin

Division of Cardiology, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98104.

A new automatic external defibrillator was tested first against a tape-recorded data base of rhythms and then during use by first-responding fire fighters in a tiered emergency system. The sensitivity for correctly classifying ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia was substantially less during clinical testing in 298 patients than would have been predicted from preclinical results: 52% of ventricular fibrillation analyses in patients were correctly classified versus 88% of episodes in the data base, and 22 versus 86%, respectively, for ventricular tachycardia (p less than 0.001). The detection algorithm was modified and evaluated further in another 322 patients. The modified detector performed substantially better than did the one that had been designed from prerecorded rhythms: with its use, 118 (94%) of 125 patients in ventricular fibrillation were counter-shocked compared with 91 (77%) of 118 similar patients with use of the initial algorithm (p less than 0.001). No inappropriate shocks were delivered. This improvement resulted in a shorter time to first shock (p less than 0.01) and more shocks being delivered for persistent or recurrent episodes of ventricular fibrillation (p less than 0.05). Of 620 patients treated with the automatic defibrillator, 243 (39%) had ventricular fibrillation; 57 (23%) of the 243 regained pulse and blood pressure before paramedics arrived, 141 (58%) were admitted to hospital and 71 (29%) were discharged.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. A. Cobb, C. E. Fahrenbruch, M. Olsufka, and M. K. Copass
Changing Incidence of Out-of-Hospital Ventricular Fibrillation, 1980-2000
JAMA, December 18, 2002; 288(23): 3008 - 3013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. A. Cobb, C. E. Fahrenbruch, T. R. Walsh, M. K. Copass, M. Olsufka, M. Breskin, and A. P. Hallstrom
Influence of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Prior to Defibrillation in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Ventricular Fibrillation
JAMA, April 7, 1999; 281(13): 1182 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
W. T. Longstreth Jr, L. A. Cobb, C. E. Fahrenbruch, and M. K. Copass
The Utility of CPR in Elderly Persons-Reply
JAMA, February 20, 1991; 265(7): 867 - 867.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement