Advances in the hemodynamic assessment of stenotic cardiac valves

Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425.

In 1951 Gorlin and Gorlin (Am Heart J 1951;41:1-29) published their formula for calculating the area of a stenotic cardiac valve from hemodynamic data. The important concept implicit in this formula is that the hemodynamic evaluation of a stenotic valve requires that the pressure gradient across that valve be examined in light of the cardiac output passing through the orifice. The concept asserts that if an accurately obtained pressure gradient can be related to an accurate cardiac output by an accurate formula, valve area can be determined. However, recent studies have demonstrated flaws in current practices for obtaining transvalvular gradients and cardiac outputs. Further, new data are available regarding the validation and possible changes in the Gorlin formula, validation and changes that the Gorlins noted might be necessary to make. These new data concerning the three basic requirements of an accurate valve area determination are the subject of this review.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Lembcke, T. Durmus, Y. Westermann, A. Geigenmueller, B. Claus, C. Butler, and H. Thiele Assessment of Mitral Valve Stenosis by Helical MDCT: Comparison With Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography and Cardiac Catheterization Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2011; 197(3): 614 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. de la Morena, D. Saura, M. J. Oliva, F. Soria, J. Gonzalez, M. Garcia, V. Moreno, J. C. Bonaque, and M. Valdes Real-time three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, January 1, 2010; 11(1): 9 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. K. Laskey, W. G. Kussmaul III, and A. Noordergraaf Systemic Arterial Response to Exercise in Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis Circulation, February 24, 2009; 119(7): 996 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Schwammenthal, Z. Vered, Y. Moshkowitz, B. Rabinowitz, Z. Ziskind, A. K. Smolinski, and M. S. Feinberg Dobutamine Echocardiography in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Left Ventricular Dysfunction : Predicting Outcome as a Function of Management Strategy Chest, June 1, 2001; 119(6): 1766 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Binder, R. Rosenhek, G. Porenta, G. Maurer, and H. Baumgartner Improved assessment of mitral valve stenosis by volumetric real-time three-dimensional echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1355 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Arsenault, N. Masani, G. Magni, J. Yao, L. Deras, and N. Pandian Variation of anatomic valve area during ejection in patients with valvular aortic stenosis evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry: comparison with traditional Doppler data J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1998; 32(7): 1931 - 1937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hasegawa, S. Kitamura, S. Taniguchi, T. Kawata, K. Niwaya, K. Mizuguchi, H. Nishioka, and Y. Kameda Comparative Rest and Exercise Hemodynamics of Allograft and Prosthetic Valves in the Aortic Position Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1997; 64(6): 1753 - 1756. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. A. Carabello Timing of Valve Replacement in Aortic Stenosis : Moving Closer to Perfection Circulation, May 6, 1997; 95(9): 2241 - 2243. [Full Text]