Cost-effectiveness analysis of patient management alternatives after uncomplicated myocardial infarction: a model

Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, Division of General Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46202.

Quantitative decision analyses provide a means whereby the effectiveness, in terms of patient outcome, and costs of diverse clinical approaches to the care of patients with cardiovascular disease can be made explicit and understandable. Increasingly, the profession is being required to justify the costs of clinical care to society, government and third party payers. Such justifications can be effectively presented when structured in decision analytic format. To demonstrate the utility of decision analysis and its extension--cost-effectiveness analysis--as a technique for presenting the rationale for clinical practices and technology utilization, the Cardiovascular Norms Committee of the American College of Cardiology sponsored a model cost-effectiveness analysis. Alternative management options, 6 month mortality and costs for the post-myocardial infarction patient were compared. The options included exercise electrocardiography, exercise thallium scintigraphy and coronary angiography, followed by coronary artery bypass surgery for patients with left main coronary disease only or patients with left main disease, three vessel disease or single or double vessel disease and a significant amount of myocardium in jeopardy. Within the constraints of the model, proceeding directly to angiography for risk stratification was the most effective approach, lowering expected mortality from 8% to approximately 3%. The marginal costs for this strategy, however, were high. The most cost-effective approach was to screen patients initially with exercise electrocardiography.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Hernandez and L. Vale The Value of Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis and Management of Angina and Myocardial Infarction: A Probabilistic Economic Analysis Med Decis Making, December 1, 2007; 27(6): 772 - 788. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G Boriani, M Biffi, C Martignani, M Gallina, and A Branzi Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2001; 22(12): 990 - 996. [PDF]

				P. J. Scanlon, D. P. Faxon, A.-M. Audet, B. Carabello, G. J. Dehmer, K. A. Eagle, R. D. Legako, D. F. Leon, J. A. Murray, S. E. Nissen, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1756 - 1824. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Kuntz, J. Tsevat, L. Goldman, and M. C. Weinstein Cost-effectiveness of Routine Coronary Angiography After Acute Myocardial Infarction Circulation, September 1, 1996; 94(5): 957 - 965. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				STRESS TEST AFTER UNCOMPLICATED AMI IS MORE COST- EFFECTIVE THAN ANGIOGRAPHY Journal Watch (General), October 9, 1987; 1987(1009): 5 - 5. [Full Text]