Influence of sampling site and flow area on cardiac output measurements by Doppler echocardiography

Medical Department III, University of Tuebingen, West Germany.

In 40 patients cardiac output was simultaneously determined by pulsed Doppler echocardiography and thermodilution (range 4.0 to 10.2 liters/min). The sample volume was located in the center of the mitral anulus, at the tips of the mitral leaflets and in the center of the aortic anulus. Circular cross-sectional areas of the mitral anulus, aortic anulus and aortic bulbus were calculated from M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiographic diameters. The varying short axis of the elliptical mitral opening area was obtained from the diastolic leaflet separation in the M-mode, and the long axis was derived from the maximal mitral orifice area or mitral anulus diameter. Cardiac output was calculated by multiplying time-velocity integrals with the different areas and heart rate. Doppler flow measurements correlated significantly with the thermodilution method (r = 0.79 to 0.93). Flow measurements at the aortic anulus were most accurate (r = 0.93, SEE = 0.589 liter/min) if the annular area was derived from the M-mode tracing. Measurement of the anulus in the apical five chamber view yielded a significant underestimation and the area of the aortic bulbus provided an overestimation of cardiac output. Left ventricular inflow was underestimated at the mitral leaflet tips and overestimated at the mitral anulus. The accuracy of pulsed Doppler cardiac output measurements strongly depends on the assumed flow area and sampling site. Both should be determined at the same level in the inflow or outflow tract of the left ventricle. Measurement of cardiac output in the center of the aortic anulus provided the highest accuracy.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Thomas and Z. B. Popovic Assessment of Left Ventricular Function by Cardiac Ultrasound J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 2012 - 2025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sadik, B. Rundqvist, N. Selimovic, and O. Bech-Hanssen Improved stroke volume assessment in the aortic and mitral valves with a new method in subjects without regurgitation Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2005; 6(3): 210 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Akamatsu, A. Oda, E. Terazawa, T. Yamamoto, H. Ohata, T. Michino, and S. Dohi Automated Cardiac Output Measurement by Transesophageal Color Doppler Echocardiography Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1232 - 1238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Dennig, H J Nesser, D Hall, H U Haase, and A Schömig Determination of prestenotic flow volume using an automated method based on colour Doppler imaging for evaluating orifice area by the continuity equation: validation in a pulsatile flow model Heart, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 324 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. B. Devereux, M. J. Roman, G. de Simone, M. J. O'Grady, M. Paranicas, J. Yeh, R. R. Fabsitz, and B. V. Howard Relations of Left Ventricular Mass to Demographic and Hemodynamic Variables in American Indians : The Strong Heart Study Circulation, September 2, 1997; 96(5): 1416 - 1423. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. P. Sun, M. Pu, F. M. Fouad, R. Christian, W. J. Stewart, and J. D. Thomas Automated Cardiac Output Measurement by Spatiotemporal Integration of Color Doppler Data: In Vitro and Clinical Validation Circulation, February 18, 1997; 95(4): 932 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. D. Waggoner and C. Davis Quantitative Echoca rdiograpy Part III: A Review of Methods for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Performance by Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, November 1, 1995; 11(6): 285 - 299. [Abstract] [PDF]