|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1987; 10:761-774 © 1987 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.
This investigation was undertaken to elucidate the underlying electrophysiologic substrate in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and to identify possible predictors of sudden death in this patient population. Programmed stimulation was performed in 18 patients aged 14 to 64 years (mean 36) believed to be at high risk for sudden death on the basis of prior cardiac arrest or syncope, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring or a family history of frequent sudden death. Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia that deteriorated to ventricular fibrillation was reproducibly induced in 8 (44%) of the 18 patients (Group A). This rhythm was induced in all three patients with a history of cardiac arrest. No sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was induced. Group B comprised the 10 patients in whom a sustained arrhythmia could not be reproducibly initiated. The electrophysiologic substrate was distinctly different in patients with, than in those without, inducible sustained arrhythmia. The refractory period was shorter at the right ventricular outflow tract (232 +/- 22 ms) compared with the apex (264 +/- 12 ms) in Group A (p less than 0.005) whereas there was no difference in Group B (271 +/- 25 ms versus 271 +/- 13 ms). The local ventricular electrogram of most patients in both groups was prolonged and markedly multiphasic. However, 5 of the 8 Group A patients exhibited a double electrogram (V-V') with premature stimulation compared with 1 of the 10 patients in Group B (p less than 0.02). A positive R wave in lead aVR of the scalar ECG and poor R wave progression in the precordial leads were more common in Group A than in Group B (p less than 0.001 and p less than 0.001, respectively). The reason for the distinctly different electrophysiologic substrate and the high prevalence of inducible polymorphic arrhythmia is unclear. It may relate to the underlying myocardial architecture in these patients, characterized by myocardial cellular disarray and fibrosis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. D'Andrea, P. Caso, S. Severino, S. Cuomo, G. Capozzi, P. Calabro, G. Cice, L. Ascione, M. Scherillo, and R. Calabro Prognostic value of intra-left ventricular electromechanical asynchrony in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2006; 27(11): 1311 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A D'Andrea, P Caso, S Cuomo, G Salerno, R Scarafile, C Mita, G De Corato, B Sarubbi, M Scherillo, R Calabro, et al. Prognostic value of intra-left ventricular electromechanical asynchrony in patients with mild hypertrophic cardiomyopathy compared with power athletes * Commentary. Br. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2006; 40(3): 244 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. P. Sengupta, V. Mehta, J. C. Mohan, R. Arora, and B. K. Khandheria Regional myocardial function in an arrhythmogenic milieu: tissue velocity and strain rate imaging in a patient who had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with recurrent ventricular tachycardia Eur J Echocardiogr, December 1, 2004; 5(6): 438 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Siddiqui and I. A. Khan Role of Lead aVR in Evaluation of 12-Lead Electrocardiogram Angiology, November 1, 2002; 53(6): 709 - 713. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Gil, F. Arribas, and F. G. Cosio Ventricular fibrillation induced by rapid atrial rates in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(4): 327 - 332. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |