|
|
||||||||||
|
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1987; 10:719-732 © 1987 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation |
Cardiology Section, VA Medical Center, Denver, Colorado 80220.
The Veterans Administration Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease was organized to compare survival and incidence of valve-related complications between patients receiving a bioprosthesis (the Hancock porcine heterograft) and a mechanical prosthesis (the Bjork-Shiley spherical disc valve). Five hundred seventy-five patients undergoing single aortic or mitral valve replacement were randomized at surgery to one of the two valve types. At an average follow-up of 5 years (range 3 to 8) there are no statistically significant differences in survival between patients with the two valve types in the aortic valve replacement group. There is a statistically nonsignificant trend toward improved survival in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement with a bioprosthesis compared with a mechanical prosthesis (5 year survival probability was 0.70 +/- 0.05 and 0.58 +/- 0.06, respectively). Fatal and nonfatal valve-related complications occurred significantly less frequently in patients with a bioprosthesis compared with a mechanical prosthesis for both mitral and aortic valve replacement. Five year complication-free probability was 0.67 +/- 0.05 and 0.45 +/- 0.06, respectively, for patients with mitral valve replacement and 0.63 +/- 0.04 and 0.53 +/- 0.04, respectively, for those with aortic valve replacement. The difference in overall complication rates was largely due to the increased number of clinically significant but nonfatal bleeding episodes in patients receiving a mechanical prosthesis. Adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics between patients receiving a mitral mechanical prosthesis and a mitral bioprosthesis reduced the statistical significance of the difference in both mortality and complications.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E B Schelbert, M S Vaughan-Sarrazin, K F Welke, and G E Rosenthal Valve type and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement in older patients Heart, September 1, 2008; 94(9): 1181 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: Stented Pericardial and Porcine Valves Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 857 - 894. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Kalkat, M.-B. Edwards, K. M. Taylor, and R. S. Bonser Composite Aortic Valve Graft Replacement: Mortality Outcomes in a National Registry Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11_suppl): I-301 - I-306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lima, G. C. Hughes, A. Lemaire, J. Jaggers, D. D. Glower, and W. G. Wolfe Short-Term and Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Aortic Root Replacement with St. Jude Mechanical Conduits and Aortic Allografts Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2006; 82(2): 579 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.R.E. Jamieson, O. von Lipinski, R.T. Miyagishima, L.H. Burr, M.T. Janusz, H. Ling, G.J. Fradet, F. Chan, and E. Germann Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses assessed by composites of valve-related complications to 15 years after mitral valve replacement J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2005; 129(6): 1301 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Oxenham, P Bloomfield, D J Wheatley, R J Lee, J Cunningham, R J Prescott, and H C Miller Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses Heart, July 1, 2003; 89(7): 715 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis Stented Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 825 - 856. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Khan, A. Trento, M. DeRobertis, R. M. Kass, M. Sandhu, L. S. C. Czer, C. Blanche, S. Raissi, G. P. Fontana, W. Cheng, et al. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2001; 122(2): 257 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hammermeister, G. K. Sethi, W. G. Henderson, F. L. Grover, C. Oprian, and S. H. Rahimtoola Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1152 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. F. Ungacta, V. G. Davila-Roman, M. J. Moulton, B. P. Cupps, P. Moustakidis, D. S. Fishman, R. Actis, B. A. Szabo, D. Li, N. T. Kouchoukos, et al. MRI-Radiofrequency Tissue Tagging in Patients With Aortic Insufficiency Before and After Operation Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1998; 65(4): 943 - 950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Potyk and P. Raudaskoski Preoperative Cardiac Evaluation for Elective Noncardiac Surgery Arch Fam Med, March 1, 1998; 7(2): 164 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.R. E. Jamieson, A. I. Munro, L. H. Burr, E. Germann, R. T. Miyagishima, and H. Ling Influence of Coronary Artery Bypass and Age on Clinical Performance After Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement With Biological and Mechanical Prostheses Circulation, November 1, 1995; 92(9): 101 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Khan, A. Chaux, J. Matloff, C. Blanche, M. DeRobertis, R. Kass, T. P. Tsai, A. Trento, S. Nessim, R. Gray, et al. The St. Jude Medical valveExperience with 1000 cases J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 1994; 108(6): 1010 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. L. Grover, D. J. Cohen, C. Oprian, W. G. Henderson, G. Sethi, K. E. Hammermeister, and Participants in the Department of Veterans Affairs Determinants of the occurrence of and survival from prosthetic valve endocarditisExperience of the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular Heart Disease J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1994; 108(2): 207 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Hammermeister, G. K. Sethi, W. G. Henderson, C. Oprian, T. Kim, S. Rahimtoola, and The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Valvular A Comparison of Outcomes in Men 11 Years after Heart-Valve Replacement with a Mechanical Valve or Bioprosthesis N. Engl. J. Med., May 6, 1993; 328(18): 1289 - 1296. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
PORCINE AND MECHANICAL HEART VALVES COMPARED Journal Watch (General), October 9, 1987; 1987(1009): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | SUBSCRIPTIONS | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | CARDIOSOURCE | SEARCH | HELP | FEEDBACK |