JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1987; 10:682-692
© 1987 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maddahi, J
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maddahi, J
Right arrow Articles by Bradley, W

Noninvasive quantification of left ventricular myocardial mass by gated proton nuclear magnetic resonance imaging

J Maddahi, J Crues, DS Berman, J Mericle, A Becerra, EV Garcia, R Henderson, and W Bradley

The validity of cardiac nuclear magnetic resonance imaging for determination of left ventricular myocardial mass was evaluated in nine dogs. A gated spin echo-pulsing sequence was used for in vivo imaging, obtaining 0.7 cm thick slices of the heart spaced by 1 cm. On each imaged slice, the left ventricular surface area was reproducibly determined by planimetry and was multiplied by slice spacing and specific gravity of the myocardium (1.05) to obtain slice mass. Total left ventricular mass was calculated by adding slice masses in short-axis (method I), transaxial (method II) and vertical long-axis (method III) orientations using Simpson's rule. With each method, masses of the portions of the left ventricle subject to partial volume effect either were not accounted for or alternatively were estimated from the same or an orthogonal imaging plane. Calculated left ventricular mass was compared with the actual excised left ventricular weight. With NMR imaging of in situ nonbeating hearts, best results were obtained when either method I or method II was used and partial volume effect was estimated either from the same or an orthogonal plane. With in vivo NMR imaging, best results were noted when method I was used and mass of the partial volume apex was calculated from transaxial slices: Y (in vivo NMR image) = 8.3 + 0.99X, r = 0.996, SEE = 3.14. For this method, the interobserver reliability coefficient and standard error of the measurement were 0.97 and 5.4, respectively. Compared with method I, in vivo methods II and III were associated with larger errors (SEE ranging from 13.03 to 19.03) regardless of the approach used to estimate partial volume effect. It is concluded that NMR imaging is a highly accurate noninvasive method for in vivo measurement of left ventricular mass in dogs and offers promise for accurate measurement of left ventricular mass in patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. C. C. Moon, C. H. Lorenz, J. M. Francis, G. C. Smith, and D. J. Pennell
Breath-hold FLASH and FISP Cardiovascular MR Imaging: Left Ventricular Volume Differences and Reproducibility
Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 789 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. G. Myerson, N. G. Bellenger, and D. J. Pennell
Assessment of Left Ventricular Mass by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Hypertension, March 1, 2002; 39(3): 750 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. W. Koskenvuo, J. J. Hartiala, J. Knuuti, H. Sakuma, J. O. Toikka, M. Komu, M. Saraste, and P. Niemi
Assessing Coronary Sinus Blood Flow in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparison of Phase-Contrast MR Imaging with Positron Emission Tomography
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1161 - 1166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1987 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.