Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1987; 10:406-411
© 1987 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wetherbee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Troup, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wetherbee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Troup, P.

Nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation in dogs: threshold reduction using a subcutaneous chest wall electrode with a transvenous catheter electrode

JN Wetherbee, PD Chapman, HS Klopfenstein, SM Bach Jr, and PJ Troup

The efficacy of truncated exponential waveform shocks using a cardioverter-defibrillator catheter with and without a 13.9 cm2 subcutaneous thoracic patch electrode was examined in 10 pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs. The cardioverter-defibrillator catheter was positioned through the external jugular vein with the distal 4 cm2 shocking electrode located in the right ventricular apex and the 8 cm2 proximal electrode located in the superior vena cava. Four electrode configurations were tested: 1) distal electrode (cathode) to proximal electrode and chest wall patch (common anodes), 2) distal electrode (cathode) to chest wall patch (anode), 3) distal electrode (cathode) to proximal electrode (anode), and 4) chest wall patch (cathode) to proximal electrode (anode). The lowest randomized energy resulting in termination of alternating current-induced ventricular fibrillation on four trials at that energy was 20.2, 21.3, 27.4 and greater than 40 J, respectively, for configurations 1 through 4. The energy requirements for configurations 1, 2 and 3 were significantly lower than for configuration 4 (p less than 0.001). Additionally, configurations incorporating the distal electrode and the patch electrode (configurations 1 and 2) were significantly better than the catheter alone (configuration 3; p less than 0.05). There was no significant difference between configurations 1 and 2. In conclusion, the addition of a subcutaneous chest wall electrode to the cardioverter-defibrillator catheter significantly lowered energy requirements for defibrillation, suggesting that a nonthoracotomy approach for the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is feasible.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
J. Winter, J. E. Heil, C. Schumann, Y. Lin, C. M. Schannwell, U. Michel, J. D. Schipke, H. D. Schulte, and E. Gams
Effect of implantable cardioverter/defibrillator lead placement in the right ventricle on defibrillation energy requirements. A combined experimental and clinical study
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, October 1, 1998; 14(4): 419 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. C. Fotuhi, R. E. Ideker, S. F. Idriss, R. L. Callihan, R. G. Walker, and E. U. Alt
Influence of Epicardial Patches on Defibrillation Threshold With Nonthoracotomy Lead Configurations
Circulation, November 15, 1995; 92(10): 3082 - 3088.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. Saksena, N. G. Tullo, R. B. Krol, and A. M. Mauro
Initial Clinical Experience With Endocardial Defibrillation Using an Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator With a Triple-Electrode System
Arch Intern Med, October 1, 1989; 149(10): 2333 - 2339.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement