Electrophysiologic testing in patients with unexplained syncope: clinical and noninvasive predictors of outcome

To assess whether the level of risk of having significant electrophysiologic abnormalities can be determined, 29 clinical variables were analyzed in 104 patients with unexplained syncope who underwent electrophysiologic testing. A positive electrophysiologic study was defined as: a sinus node recovery time greater than or equal to 3 seconds; HV interval greater than or equal to 100 ms; infranodal block during atrial pacing; unimorphic ventricular tachycardia; and supraventricular tachycardia associated with hypotension. Thirty-one patients had a positive study, with inducible ventricular tachycardia being the most common finding (71% of positive studies). A left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 0.40 was the most powerful predictor of a positive electrophysiologic study (p less than 0.00001), followed by the presence of bundle branch block (p less than 0.00003), coronary artery disease (p less than 0.0003), remote myocardial infarction (p less than 0.00006), use of type 1 antiarrhythmic drugs (p less than 0.00003), injury related to loss of consciousness (p less than 0.01) and male sex (p less than 0.01). A negative electrophysiologic study was associated with an ejection fraction greater than 0.40 (p less than 0.00001), the absence of structural heart disease (p less than 0.00001), a normal electrocardiogram (ECG) (p less than 0.0001) and normal ambulatory ECG monitoring (p less than 0.0001). The probability of a negative study increased as the number and duration of syncopal episodes increased.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M J Reed and A Gray Collapse query cause: the management of adult syncope in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. J., August 1, 2006; 23(8): 589 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Garcia-Civera, R. Ruiz-Granell, S. Morell-Cabedo, R. Sanjuan-Manez, F. Perez-Alcala, E. Plancha, A. Navarro, S. Botella, and A. LLacer Selective use of diagnostic tests inpatients with syncope of unknown cause J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 5, 2003; 41(5): 787 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Pezawas, G. Stix, J. Kastner, M. Wolzt, C. Mayer, D. Moertl, and H. Schmidinger Unexplained syncope in patients with structural heart disease and no documented ventricular arrhythmias: value of electrophysiologically guided implantablecardioverter defibrillator therapy Europace, January 1, 2003; 5(3): 305 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F P Sarasin, A-F Junod, D Carballo, S Slama, P-F Unger, and M Louis-Simonet Role of echocardiography in the evaluation of syncope: a prospective study Heart, October 1, 2002; 88(4): 363 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Soteriades, J. C. Evans, M. G. Larson, M. H. Chen, L. Chen, E. J. Benjamin, and D. Levy Incidence and Prognosis of Syncope N. Engl. J. Med., September 19, 2002; 347(12): 878 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S D Crane Risk stratification of patients with syncope in an accident and emergency department Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2002; 19(1): 23 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mittal, S. C. Hao, S. Iwai, K. M. Stein, S. M. Markowitz, D. J. Slotwiner, and B. B. Lerman Significance of inducible ventricular fibrillation in patients with coronary artery disease and unexplained syncope J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2001; 38(2): 371 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J Sagrista-Sauleda, B Romero-Ferrer, A Moya, G Permanyer-Miralda, and J Soler-Soler Variations in diagnostic yield of head-up tilt test and electrophysiology in groups of patients with syncope of unknown origin Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2001; 22(10): 857 - 865. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W Arthur and G C Kaye Important points in the clinical evaluation of patients with syncope Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2001; 77(904): 99 - 102. [Full Text]

				W Arthur and G C Kaye Current investigations used to assess syncope Postgrad. Med. J., January 1, 2001; 77(903): 20 - 23. [Full Text]

				M. Brignole, C. Menozzi, A. Del Rosso, S. Costa, G. Gaggioli, N. Bottoni, P. Bartoli, and R. Sutton New classification of haemodynamics of vasovagal syncope: beyond the VASIS classification: Analysis of the pre-syncopal phase of the tilt test without and with nitroglycerin challenge Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(1): 66 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M Brignole, G Gaggioli, C Menozzi, A Del Rosso, S Costa, A Bartoletti, N Bottoni, and G Lolli Clinical features of adenosine sensitive syncope and tilt induced vasovagal syncope Heart, January 1, 2000; 83(1): 24 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. P. Andrews, R. I. Fogel, G. Pelargonio, J. J. Evans, and E. N. Prystowsky Implantable defibrillator event rates in patients with unexplained syncope and inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: A comparison with patients known to have sustained ventricular tachycardia J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1999; 34(7): 2023 - 2030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mittal, S. Iwai, K. M. Stein, S. M. Markowitz, D. J. Slotwiner, and B. B. Lerman Long-term outcome of patients with unexplained syncope treated with an electrophysiologic-guided approach in the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator era J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1082 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. P. Knight, R. Goyal, F. Pelosi, M. Flemming, L. Horwood, F. Morady, and S. A. Strickberger Outcome of patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and unexplained syncope treated with an implantable defibrillator J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 1999; 33(7): 1964 - 1970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Brignole, G. Gaggioli, C. Menozzi, L. Gianfranchi, A. Bartoletti, N. Bottoni, G. Lolli, D. Oddone, D. Attilio Del Rosso, and G. Pellinghelli Adenosine-Induced Atrioventricular Block in Patients With Unexplained Syncope : The Diagnostic Value of ATP Testing Circulation, December 2, 1997; 96(11): 3921 - 3927. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Poppas, R. Sawyer, C. Kinder, P. Vignon, J. Bednarz, B. K. Lee, T. Feldman, S. Glagov, and R. M. Lang A 73-Year-Old Man With Hypertension and Syncope Circulation, January 15, 1996; 93(2): 380 - 386. [Full Text]

				G. J. Klein, B. J. Gersh, and R. Yee Electrophysiological Testing : The Final Court of Appeal for Diagnosis of Syncope? Circulation, September 1, 1995; 92(5): 1332 - 1335. [Full Text]

				T. Lerman-Sagie, P. Lerman, M. Mukamel, L. Blieden, and M. Mimouni A Prospective Evaluation of Pediatric Patients With Syncope Clinical Pediatrics, February 1, 1994; 33(2): 66 - 70. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. N. Kapoor Evaluation and Management of the Patient With Syncope JAMA, November 11, 1992; 268(18): 2553 - 2560. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. P. DiMarco and J. T. Philbrick Use of Ambulatory Electrocardiographic (Holter) Monitoring Ann Intern Med, July 1, 1990; 113(1): 53 - 68. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. S. Manolis, M. Linzer, D. Salem, and N. A. M. Estes III Syncope: Current Diagnostic Evaluation and Management Ann Intern Med, June 1, 1990; 112(11): 850 - 863. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Denes, E. Uretz, M. D. Ezri, and J. Borbola Clinical Predictors of Electrophysiologic Findings in Patients With Syncope of Unknown Origin Arch Intern Med, September 1, 1988; 148(9): 1922 - 1928. [Abstract] [PDF]