Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1987; 10:90-96
© 1987 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kadish, A.
Right arrow Articles by Marchlinski, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kadish, A.
Right arrow Articles by Marchlinski, F.

Usefulness of electrophysiologic study to determine the clinical tolerance of arrhythmia recurrences during amiodarone therapy

AH Kadish, AE Buxton, HL Waxman, B Flores, ME Josephson, and FE Marchlinski

The relation of clinical and electrophysiologic variables to outcome was evaluated in 121 patients treated with amiodarone for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Electrophysiologic study was performed in all patients a mean of 14 days after beginning amiodarone therapy. Forty-six patients who were given oral amiodarone therapy experienced arrhythmia recurrence. Multivariate analysis was performed using 16 clinical and electrophysiologic variables to determine which factors were associated with 1) arrhythmia recurrence and 2) a poorly tolerated arrhythmia recurrence (that is, cardiac arrest or sudden cardiac death) during oral amiodarone therapy. No variable predicted arrhythmia recurrence. Five variables correlated significantly with a poorly tolerated arrhythmia recurrence. Hemodynamic stability of the arrhythmia induced on electrophysiologic testing during amiodarone therapy had the best predictive value (p less than 0.001). Younger age, lower ejection fraction, a poorly tolerated rhythm at clinical presentation and absence of left ventricular aneurysm were also associated with a poorly tolerated arrhythmia recurrence. Only 3 of 57 patients who had a well tolerated arrhythmia induced on electrophysiologic testing during amiodarone therapy had recurrence of a poorly tolerated arrhythmia versus 19 of 47 who had hemodynamically unstable arrhythmias induced during amiodarone therapy (p less than 0.001). Thus, electrophysiologic testing during amiodarone therapy appears useful in identifying patients who are prone to have catastrophic arrhythmia recurrences and could allow for the institution of additional or alternative modes of therapy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J.u. Schlapfer, F. Rapp, L. Kappenberger, and M. Fromer
Electrophysiologically guided amiodarone therapy versus the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias after myocardial infarction: Results of long-term follow-up
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 5, 2002; 39(11): 1813 - 1819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. J. Connolly
Evidence-Based Analysis of Amiodarone Efficacy and Safety
Circulation, November 9, 1999; 100(19): 2025 - 2034.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. E. Marchlinski
Predicting Arrhythmic Death : A Plea for Standardized Reporting Techniques and Data Based on Continuous Electrocardiographic Monitoring
Circulation, September 16, 1997; 96(6): 1713 - 1716.
[Full Text]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
F. E. Marchlinski
Treatment of Sustained Ventricular Arrhythmias: Which Therapy to Use?
Ann Intern Med, October 1, 1988; 109(7): 522 - 525.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement