JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1983; 1:1512-1517
© 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldhaber, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wynne, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goldhaber, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wynne, J

Prevention by nifedipine of cold pressor-induced decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction

SZ Goldhaber, HD White, BL Holman, RW Nesto, GH Mudge Jr, JE Muller, J Kozlowski, and J Wynne

To examine the effects of nifedipine on changes in ventricular function produced by cold, the cold pressor test was administered to eight patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. Radionuclide ventriculograms were obtained at baseline and during the cold pressor stimulus both before and after administration of nifedipine, 10 mg buccally; thus, four serial radionuclide ventriculograms were obtained per patient. The cold pressor stimulus did not produce any significant difference in the mean (+/- standard deviation) peak rate-pressure product during the control or nifedipine test (10,900 +/- 3,390 versus 10,600 +/- 3,700). However, the increase in systolic blood pressure (p = 0.05) and the peak systolic blood pressure achieved (p less than 0.001) were greater during the control (134 +/- 19 to 160 +/- 25 mm Hg) than during the nifedipine (125 +/- 18 to 145 +/- 21 mm Hg) cold pressor test. The mean global left ventricular ejection fraction decreased during the control cold pressor test from a baseline value of 0.60 +/- 0.08 to 0.52 +/- 0.08 (p = 0.004). After nifedipine, this variable did not change during the repeat cold pressor test (0.63 +/- 0.09) compared with the repeat baseline value (0.63 +/- 0.11). Therefore, the difference in left ventricular ejection fraction response during control versus nifedipine cold pressor testing was highly significant (p less than 0.0001). In patients with obstructive coronary artery disease, nifedipine abolished the decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction observed during the control cold pressor test and may be of value to protect patients from cold-induced left ventricular dysfunction. The mechanism may be a combination of coronary artery vasodilation and systolic unloading of the left ventricle.





HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.