Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1983; 1:1489-1492
© 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hirshfeld, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, G.
Right arrow Articles by Hirshfeld, J., Jr

Changes in QTc interval induced with Renografin-76 and Hypaque-76 during coronary arteriography

GL Wolf and JW Hirshfeld Jr

Renografin-76 and Hypaque-76 are both recommended for coronary arteriography. Both have the same osmolality and iodine concentration, but differ in their calcium binding properties. After selective right or left coronary arteriography in patients, Renografin-76 caused significantly more prolongation of the QTc interval than did Hypaque-76. Less calcium binding in the Hypaque formulation is probably responsible for its lesser effect on the QTc interval. This study suggests, but does not prove, that Hypaque-76 is safer than Renografin-76 for coronary arteriography.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. N. Kenigsberg, S. Khanal, M. Kowalski, and S. C. Krishnan
Prolongation of the QTc Interval Is Seen Uniformly During Early Transmural Ischemia
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 27, 2007; 49(12): 1299 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
H. Tomoda and N. Aoki
Prolongation of QT Interval as a Predictor of No-Reflow Induced by Rotational Atherectomy
Angiology, July 1, 2002; 53(4): 435 - 441.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement