Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1983; 1:1479-1488
© 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, S.
Right arrow Articles by Froelicher, V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, S.
Right arrow Articles by Froelicher, V

Limitations of electrocardiographic scoring systems for estimation of left ventricular function

SG Young, S Abouantoun, M Savvides, EB Madsen, and V Froelicher

Four electrocardiographic scoring systems for the assessment of left ventricular function or presence of myocardial infarction were evaluated in 231 patients with coronary artery disease. Electrocardiographic scores were compared with radionuclide ejection fraction and thallium perfusion studies. The correlation between Wagner's modified QRS score and ejection fraction was only fair (r = -0.60). Askenazi's sum of R wave voltage score correlated poorly with ejection fraction (r = 0.44), as did Gottwik's sum of voltage score from the Frank lead electrocardiogram (r = 0.44). Rautaharju's Cardiac Infarction Injury Score did not reliably predict presence of infarction in the patient group, nor did it correlate well with ejection fraction (r = -0.49). None of the correlations were significantly improved when only patients with a history of a myocardial infarction, a thallium defect compatible with a scar or a diagnostic Q wave were considered. Although Wagner's QRS score correlated best with ejection fraction, all scoring systems had limited clinical usefulness for estimating ejection fraction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. Bosimini, P. Giannuzzi, P. L. Temporelli, F. Gentile, D. Lucci, A. P. Maggioni, L. Tavazzi, L. Badano, I. Stoian, R. Piazza, et al.
Electrocardiographic evolutionary changes and left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction: Results of the GISSI-3 Echo substudy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 127 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. L. Murkofsky, G. Dangas, J. A. Diamond, D. Mehta, A. Schaffer, and J. A. Ambrose
A prolonged QRS duration on surface electrocardiogram is a specific indicator of left ventricular dysfunction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1998; 32(2): 476 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. H. Selvester, G. S. Wagner, and N. B. Hindman
The Selvester QRS Scoring System for Estimating Myocardial Infarct Size: The Development and Application of the System
Arch Intern Med, October 1, 1985; 145(10): 1877 - 1881.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement