JACC
HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Coll Cardiol, 1983; 1:1471-1478
© 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baran, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nanda, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baran, A.
Right arrow Articles by Nanda, N.

Ejection fraction determination without planimetry by two-dimensional echocardiography: a new method

AO Baran, GJ Rogal, and NC Nanda

A new method for determining ejection fraction by two-dimensional echocardiography was assessed in 60 patients undergoing angiography. In method A, the left ventricular minor axis was measured at the midventricular cavity level in end-systole and end-diastole using the apical four chamber view in the 60 patients. The left ventricular major axis was also measured from the left ventricular apex to the base of the mitral valve at end-systole and end-diastole. The ejection fraction was determined using a modified cylinder-ellipse algorithm. In method B, measurements of the left ventricular minor axis were made in 40 consecutive patients, at the upper, middle and lower thirds of the left ventricular cavity at end-systole and end-diastole of the same cardiac cycle and left ventricular major axis was measured as in method A. With use of the same algorithm, three regional ejection fractions were determined and averaged to yield the total ejection fraction. The two echocardiographic methods were compared with single plane cineangiography in all patients and with gated nuclear scanning in 14 patients. Reproducibility was assessed by interobserver comparison. Correlation was determined in all patients and then separately for those with echocardiographic wall motion abnormalities. The correlation coefficient for all patients was 0.79 (probability [p] less than 0.001) for method A and 0.90 (p less than 0.001) for method B. For patients with wall motion abnormalities, method A had a correlation coefficient of 0.38 (p less than 0.1) and method B showed much higher correlation with r = 0.82 (p less than 0.001). Corresponding values for methods A and B in patients without wall motion abnormality were 0.85 (p less than 0.001) and 0.88 (p less than 0.001), respectively. Unlike a previous study, this method directly measures fractional shortening of left ventricular major axis and ejection fraction values are not arbitrarily modified by type of wall motion abnormality. With this method, accurate measurement of ejection fraction can be made by two-dimensional echocardiography without planimetry. In the absence of echocardiographic wall motion abnormalities, a very simple method A suffices. If wall motion abnormalities are present, the regional ejection fraction method B provides excellent results.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin Med ResHome page
T. Tak
Ejection Fraction Derived by Noninvasive Modalities Versus Left Ventricular Angiographic Determination
Clin. Med. Res., May 1, 2005; 3(2): 61 - 62.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
A. D. Waggoner and C. Davis
Quantitative Echoca rdiograpy Part III: A Review of Methods for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Performance by Two-Dimensional and Doppler Echocardiography
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, November 1, 1995; 11(6): 285 - 299.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES CARDIOSOURCE SEARCH HELP FEEDBACK
Copyright © 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.