Adverse acute and chronic effects of electrical defibrillation and cardioversion on implanted unipolar cardiac pacing systems

Six cases are presented in which a transient or chronic rise in the stimulation threshold of a permanently implanted unipolar pacemaker resulted in the loss of effective pacing after therapeutic defibrillation or cardioversion. Although damage to the pulse generator may still occur, leading to a loss of function as demonstrated in a seventh patient, improvements in the internal protection circuits of the present generation of pacemakers makes this less likely while possibly predisposing to endocardial burns and increased fibrosis at the electrode-endocardial interface. The theoretical explanations for this phenomenon are discussed, along with recommendations for the prospective and retrospective management of the pacemaker patient who requires defibrillation or cardioversion.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. P. Anstadt and J. E. Lowe Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 487 - 506. [Full Text]

				J. C. Manegold, C. W. Israel, J. R. Ehrlich, G. Duray, D. Pajitnev, F. T. Wegener, and S. H. Hohnloser External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator systems: a randomized comparison of monophasic and biphasic shock energy application Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2007; 28(14): 1731 - 1738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Lakkireddy, A. Khasnis, J. Antenacci, K. Ryshcon, M. K. Chung, D. Wallick, W. Kowalewski, D. Patel, H. Mlcochova, A. Kondur, et al. Do electrical stun guns (TASER-X26(R)) affect the functional integrity of implantable pacemakers and defibrillators? Europace, July 1, 2007; 9(7): 551 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Part 5: Electrical Therapies: Automated External Defibrillators, Defibrillation, Cardioversion, and Pacing Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-35 - IV-46. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. T. Sambelashvili, V. P. Nikolski, and I. R. Efimov Virtual electrode theory explains pacing threshold increase caused by cardiac tissue damage Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): H2183 - H2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Waller, F. Callies, and H. Langenfeld Adverse effects of direct current cardioversion on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes: Is external cardioversion contraindicated in patients with permanent pacing systems? Europace, January 1, 2004; 6(2): 165 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Anstadt and J. E. Lowe Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 471 - 494. [Full Text]

				C. D. Collard and S. C. Body Anesthetic Implications for Patients With Permanent Pacemakers Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2000; 4(3): 144 - 151. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Adult Advanced Cardiac Life Support JAMA, October 28, 1992; 268(16): 2199 - 2241. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Standards and Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiac Care (ECC) JAMA, June 6, 1986; 255(21): 2905 - 2984. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. A. Lamas, E. M. Antman, J. P. Gold, N. S. Braunwald, and J. J. Collins Pacemaker Backup-Mode Reversion and Injury during Cardiac Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1986; 41(2): 155 - 157. [Abstract] [PDF]