Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1983; 1:417-420
© 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mattleman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kane, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mattleman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kane, S.

Reliability of bedside evaluation in determining left ventricular function: correlation with left ventricular ejection fraction determined by radionuclide ventriculography

SJ Mattleman, AH Hakki, AS Iskandrian, BL Segal, and SA Kane

Ninety-nine patients with chronic coronary artery disease were prospectively evaluated to determine the reliability of historical, physical, electrocardiographic and radiologic data in predicting left ventricular ejection fraction. The left ventricular ejection fraction measured by radionuclide angiography was normal (greater than or equal to 50%) in 44 patients (group 1) and abnormal (less than 50%) in 55 patients; 36 of those 55 patients had an ejection fraction between 30 and 49% (group 2) and the remaining 19 patients had an ejection fraction of less than 30% (group 3). The ejection fraction was correctly predicted in 33 of the 44 patients (75%) in group 1 and in 47 of the 55 patients (85%) with abnormal ejection fraction (groups 2 and 3), but the degree of ventricular dysfunction was correctly predicted in only 19 patients (53%) in group 2 and in only 9 patients (47%) in group 3. Stepwise linear regression analysis was performed. The single most predictive variable was cardiomegaly as seen on chest roentgenography (R2 = 0.52). Four optimal predictive variables--cardiomegaly, myocardial infarction as seen on electrocardiography, dyspnea and rales--could explain only 61% of the observed variables in left ventricular ejection fraction. Thus, radionuclide ventriculography adds significantly to the discriminant power of the clinical, radiographic and electrocardiographic characterization of ventricular function in patients with chronic coronary heart disease.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. G. Badgett, C. R. Lucey, and C. D. Mulrow
Can the Clinical Examination Diagnose Left-Sided Heart Failure in Adults?
JAMA, June 4, 1997; 277(21): 1712 - 1719.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. S. Heckerling, S. L. Wiener, C. J. Wolfkiel, M. S. Kushner, E. M. Dodin, V. Jelnin, B. Fusman, and E. V. Chomka
Accuracy and Reproducibility of Precordial Percussion and Palpation for Detecting Increased Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume and Mass: A Comparison of Physical Findings and Ultrafast Computed Tomography of the Heart
JAMA, October 27, 1993; 270(16): 1943 - 1948.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. W. Stevenson and J. K. Perloff
The Limited Reliability of Physical Signs for Estimating Hemodynamics in Chronic Heart Failure
JAMA, February 10, 1989; 261(6): 884 - 888.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
K. A. Eagle, T. Quertermous, D. E. Singer, A. G. Mulley, V. A. Reder, C. A. Boucher, H. W. Strauss, and G. E. Thibault
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Physician Estimates Compared With Gated Blood Pool Scan Measurements
Arch Intern Med, April 1, 1988; 148(4): 882 - 885.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement