Advertisement

Click here for more guidelines.

 
 




CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home
     

J Am Coll Cardiol, 1983; 1:199-215
© 1983 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rahimtoola, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rahimtoola, S.

Valvular heart disease: a perspective

SH Rahimtoola

Valve replacement has been one of the most important advances in the management of patients with valvular heart disease. The 10 and 15 year survival rate after isolated aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Starr-Edwards valve is 56 and 44%, respectively. At 5 and 7 years, survival with the Bjork-Shiley, porcine bioprosthesis and the Starr-Edwards valve is similar. Patients operated on during the last 5 to 10 years have a much better survival rate than those operated on in the 1960s; therefore, the 10 and 15 year survival of those operated on recently should improve. All patients with a mechanical prosthesis need long-term anticoagulant therapy with drugs of the coumadin type. Porcine bioprostheses have a low failure rate up to 5 years after valve replacement; after this, valve failure occurs at an increasing rate, but the incidence at 10 and 15 years is not known. Valve replacement usually produces a marked improvement in the symptomatic status of the patient because of improved hemodynamics; ventricular function is improved in selected subsets of patients. The role of long-term vasodilator therapy has not been fully determined. Antibiotic prophylaxis for secondary prevention of rheumatic carditis and for prevention of infective endocarditis is important.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis
Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: Stented Pericardial and Porcine Valves
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 857 - 894.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
N. D. Desai and G. T. Christakis
Stented Mechanical/Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 825 - 856.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. F. Nistal, A. Hurle, J. M. Revuelta, and M. Gandarillas
CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE CARBOMEDICS VALVE: EARLY RESULTS WITH A NEW BILEAFLET MECHANICAL PROSTHESIS
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1996; 112(1): 59 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
D. R. Holmes Jr, R. A. Nishimura, G. S. Reeder, P. J. Wagner, and D. M. Ilstrup
Clinical Follow-up After Percutaneous Aortic Balloon Valvuloplasty
Arch Intern Med, June 1, 1989; 149(6): 1405 - 1409.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
C. R. MCKAY, D. T. KAWANISHI, S. CHATTERJEE, C. L. REID, and S. H. RAHIMTOOLA
Stenotic Aortic and Mitral Valves Treated with Catheter Balloon Valvuloplasty in a Patient with Small Valve Anuli
Ann Intern Med, April 1, 1988; 108(4): 568 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
Cerebral Embolism Task Force
Cardiogenic Brain Embolism
Arch Neurol, January 1, 1986; 43(1): 71 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]



 
  CME Topic Collections Past Issues Search Current Issue Home

Advertisement