





* Molecular Diagnostic Division, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Cardiology Division, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Cardiology Division, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, Italy
Manuscript received August 14, 2001; revised manuscript received December 6, 2001, accepted December 21, 2001.
* Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Eloisa Arbustini, Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Transplant Research Area, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Via Forlanini 16, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
e.arbustini{at}smatteo.pv.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BACKGROUND: It has been reported that familial DCM, associated with conduction disturbances or variable myopathies, is causally linked to LMNA gene defects.
METHODS: The LMNA gene and myocardial ultrastructural and immunochemical changes were analyzed in 73 cases of DCM (49 pure, 15 with AVB [seven familial, eight sporadic], 9 with increased sCPK), four cases of familial AVB and 19 non-DCM heart diseases. The normal controls included eight heart donor biopsies for tissue studies and 107 subjects for LMNA gene studies.
RESULTS: Five novel LMNA mutations (K97E, E111X, R190W, E317K, four base pair insertion at 1,713 cDNA) were identified in five cases of familial autosomal dominant DCM with AVB (5/15: 33%). The LMNA expression of the myocyte nuclei was reduced or absent. Western blot protein analyses of three hearts with different mutations showed an additional 30-kDa band, suggesting a degrading effect of mutated on wild-type protein. Focal disruptions, bleb formation and nuclear pore clustering were documented by electron microscopy of the myocyte nuclear membranes. None of these changes and no mutations were found in the nine patients with DCM and increased sCPK or in the disease and normal controls.
CONCLUSIONS: The LMNA gene mutations account for 33% of the DCMs with AVB, all familial autosomal dominant. Increased sCPK in patients with DCM without AVB is not a useful predictor of LMNA mutation.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On the basis of the cardiac phenotypes reported as being associated with LMNA defects, we hypothesized that atrioventricular disturbances or increased serum creatine-phosphokinase (sCPK) potentially related to subclinical myopathy may be a useful guide for LMNA analysis in patients with DCM.
The aims of this study were: 1) to assess the prevalence of LMNA gene defects in patients with DCM, associated or not with atrioventricular block (AVB) or increased sCPK, and patients with familial AVB without DCM; and 2) to characterize the pathological changes and protein expression in the myocardium of patients carrying LMNA defects.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The disease series consisted of:
first degree AVB: seven familial (five autosomal dominant and two sib pairs) and eight sporadic. Dilated cardiomyopathy was defined as familial when two or more members were found to be affected after clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic evaluation of all of the informed and consenting relatives who accepted the Familial DCM Screening Program (20) or when clinical and pathological records were provided for deceased affected members. The disease control series included:
The normal control series included:
Dilated cardiomyopathy was diagnosed on the basis of World Health Organization criteria (21). The informed and consenting relatives of all of the DCM patients underwent a clinical examination, 12-lead electrocardiography, echocardiography and sCPK determination (20). The neuromuscular assessment of probands and relatives was based on a detailed clinical history, physical examination and sCPK and serum lactate determinations. Clinical and pathological records were obtained for deceased affected relatives.
A Fisher exact test was used to compare the proportion of the mutations among phenotype groups and to assess the statistical significance of the results.
Mutation screening. The 12 exons of the LMNA gene were amplified from peripheral blood-derived genomic DNA by means of polymerase chain reaction, using primers derived from intronic sequences (14). The polymerase chain reaction fragments were analyzed by means of denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) (Transgenomic, San Jose, California) using the Wave DNA Fragment Analysis System (22). The fragments with a heteroduplex conformation were purified (QIAquick Kit, Qiagen, Santa Clarita, California) and then sequenced using a BigDye-terminator cycle sequencing system (ABI PRISM 377, Applied Biosystem, Foster City, California).
Endomyocardial biopsy. Endomyocardial biopsy was performed in all patients according to the standard procedure (23), with three to four samples being assigned to light microscopy and routine immunostaining for inflammatory cells, dystrophin and the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex, emerin, LMNA, actin and desmin (24,25). Two samples were processed for ultrastructural study and analyzed using a Zeiss EM902 electron microscope.
Light microscopy immunostaining for LMNA and emerin. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsy sections were reacted with antibodies against LMNA (Chemicon International, Inc., Temecula, California, mouse anti-human lamin A + C monoclonal Ab, 1:50) and emerin (Novocastra, Newcastle, United Kingdom, mouse anti-emerin monoclonal Ab, 1:100) using the avidin-biotin complex-peroxidase method, diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride as chromogen and 4,6 diamidino-2-phenylindole for nuclear staining (23,25). The anti-lamin antibody binds to an epitope between amino acids 464 and 572, which is shared by both lamin A and C. The positive controls included EMBs from normal heart donors and patients with DCM known to be free of LMNA defects, and heart samples from transplanted patients with valvular and ischemic disease. The negative controls consisted of sections incubated without the primary antibody. All of the reactions were performed using control procedures.
Western blot. One-dimensional electrophoresis was performed on proteins extracted from three hearts excised at transplantation (patients A-II-1, A-II-2 and B-III-1) (25). The protein-loading concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri) (26), and 25 µg of each sample was run on 10% polyacrylamide gel (SDS PAGE). After electrophoresis, the gels were transferred to nitrocellulose sheets that were immunostained, first with anti-lamin A/C monoclonal primary antibody and then with a secondary antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (25).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Clinical data. The clinical data, disease evolution and follow-up of the probands and relatives are shown in Table 1. Of the 33 family members with available clinical data, 16 were affected by DCM with AVB, three had AVB (n = 2) or left ventricular dilation (n = 1), and 14 were unaffected. DNA was available for 25 subjects (23 living, two dead) but not for six dead, one living patient and for one healthy family member. Eighteen of the 25 tested subjects are heterozygous for LMNA mutations, including nine affected by DCM with AVB, one with asymptomatic left ventricular dilation and two with an isolated AVB (one requiring pacemaker implantation). Of the remaining six heterozygous subjects, three children age 7, 12 and 13 years are free from signs and symptoms, and three young adults age 25, 29 and 39 years have premature ventricular beats.
The natural history of the disease in the five families with mutations was assessed on the basis of the clinical monitoring program for familial cardiomyopathies. Of the 18 living family members tested, seven have been followed up for 33.71 ± 8.77 months (Table 1). In the probands, the onset of the disease occurred in early middle age (mean: 37 years; range: 27 to 44). The AVB was documented as preceding the DCM in 3/5 probands and their relatives and diagnosed at the same time as the DCM in two. Of the eight living patients, four have undergone, and one is waiting for, a heart transplantation; two are stable in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II and one in NHYA class III.
The clinical evolution in the five families was different (Table 1). The living patients of family B had rapidly evolving disease; one underwent transplantation within three years of onset, and one is waiting for transplantation three months after onset. In the patients of families A, C and E, there was a long interval between the onset of AVB and DCM. Sudden death occurred in only one patient of family E (but at the age of 70 years), and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias were recorded only in the proband of family C. In family D, the proband developed the disease at the age of 41 years, and his affected mother died at age 47.
The neuromuscular assessment excluded myopathy in all of the probands and affected relatives, who had normal serum lactate levels (11.70 ± 3.19; range: 19.50 to 7.20). The levels of sCPK were minimally high (245, 341, 260 and 213 mU/ml, respectively) in one proband and three non-penetrant carriers.
Pathological studies. Light microscopy of the EMBs revealed aspecific myocyte damage and interstitial fibrosis. The ultrastructural study showed "delamination," focal ruptures, blebs and nuclear pore clustering of the myocyte nuclear membranes (Fig. 3). These defects were not observed in the EMBs of the non-mutated DCM patients.
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pathological and immunochemical findings. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of ultrastructural nuclear membrane damage associated with LMNA gene defects in DCM patients with AVB. Similar nuclear envelope disruptions, discontinuities of the inner face of the nuclear envelope, and nuclear pore clustering have been observed in patients with X-linked EDMD (27), lamin A null mice (28) and the Drosophila lamin Dm0 mutant (29). According to Hutchison et al. (30), the nuclear membrane damage and lamina fragility could develop into physical cell disruption leading to myocyte death and tissue damage. In skeletal muscle, it is likely that only a large number of altered nuclei can compromise individual multinucleated fibers, whereas in cardiac muscle, the loss of individual mono-nucleated myocytes in adults is cumulative and eventually leads to AVB and heart failure when the number of affected myocytes is sufficient to cause the phenotypes (30).
The extension of myocyte damage in nodal versus left ventricular myocardium could partly explain the earlier occurrence of AVB than left ventricular dysfunction observed in three of our five probands. The defective LMNA immunostaining of myocyte nuclear membranes associated with LMNA mutations contrasts with the normal immunostaining of the nuclei of interstitial and vascular cells. This different pattern could be related to stage-and tissue-specific LMNA expression and fits with the most intriguing and unresolved issue concerning patients with LMNA defects, that is, the selective involvement of muscular, cardiac and fat cells (30). Furthermore, the low molecular weight fragment (about 30 kDa) found only in the patients carrying mutated (K97E) or truncated (E111X) versions of the protein suggests that abnormal LMNAs may induce degradation of the normal allele product. This mechanism may contribute to the dominant negative effect of the mutated on the wild-type LMNA. Dominant negative proteins have been shown capable, in vitro, of disrupting preformed LMNA-types (31). The absence of lamin immunolabeling in cardiac myocytes and the presence of a low molecular weight fragment suggest that mutated LMNAs increase degradation of the wild-type proteins. Interestingly, cells that are not terminally differentiated and are actively cycling, such as fibroblasts, endothelial and smooth muscle cells, still contain enough LMNAs to be detected by immunostaining. A-type-lamin protein levels increase with the terminal differentiation and growth arrest, while the corresponding mRNA levels significantly decrease, suggesting a role for transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms in controlling LMNA levels (32). If the mutated LMNA induces an increased degradation of the wild-type protein, terminally differentiated cells such as cardiac myocytes will be progressively depleted of type-A-lamins. Furthermore, the low LMNA mRNA levels present in those cells will not be able to sustain a proportional increase in translation of LMNA mRNA to compensate for the increased degradation rate. On the contrary, in cycling cells, the higher mRNA levels (32) will partially compensate the increased degradation of the protein induced by the mutant.
Genotype-phenotype correlation. The genotype-phenotype correlation seems to be quite complex: neither the involvement of given protein domains nor the type of mutation characteristically recurs in DCM with conduction disease. One of our five mutations (E111X in coil 1b) predicts a very small (12 kDa) truncated soluble peptide. Two of the other four mutations (K97E and R190W) are in coil 1b, which is part of the region necessary for lamin B-LMNA interactions and tetramere formation (27). One (E317K) is in a segment of coil 2 that does not interact with proteins or chromatin, and one (insertion ctgc 2869 cDNA) is in a tail domain of the protein essential for LMNA-emerin interactions (30). The observed differences in clinical manifestations and disease evolution in our families (the mildest phenotype is in family E with the E317K LMNA mutation) suggest that the impaired nuclear lamina interactions may play a role in the phenotype.
The hypothesis of a complex genotype/phenotype correlation is strengthened by the informative family #1 described by Bonne et al. (14), in which the same mutation co-segregated with both DCM and EDMD, and by the family described by Brodsky et al. with coexistent LGMD, EDMD and DCM (7). In our series, none of the nine DCM patients with increased sCPK, but without AVB, had LMNA gene defects; the B-III-1 proband, and subjects C-II-1, C-II-2 and D-III-4, who had slightly raised sCPK levels, had no contractures and did not show any clinical signs of myopathy. The size of the pedigrees does not explain these inconsistencies. For example, of the four sons of EDMD patient III-11 reported by Bonne et al. (14), two had EDMD (IV-13 and 14), and two had DCM (IV-15 and 16). It is therefore likely that factors other than LMNA mutations influence the phenotype, such as tissue-specific or systemic modifier gene expression, and the late and variable penetrance of the defects.
Role of AVB in molecular diagnosis. In the cardiological setting, the AVB associated with DCM is a reliable marker for LMNA gene molecular screening (3,4). In our series, none of the DCM patients without AVB had any LMNA defects, and none of their EMBs showed the ultrastructural and immunostaining defects observed in the five patients with LMNA gene mutations. The absence of LMNA mutations in our four families with isolated AVB does not exclude the indication for LMNA screening, as AVB preceded DCM diagnosis in three of our five families (Families A, C and E).
Genetic counseling. A major issue in genetic counseling is the risk of sudden death in carriers of LMNA mutation (3,4,33). In our series, sudden death was recorded in only one affected family member of the oldest patient (Family E), but life-threatening arrhythmias were recorded in Patient C-I-2. The currently available data do not clarify whether mutated subjects with normal electrocardiograms and ventricular function risk sudden death. This information would be essential for counseling and, potentially, for preventing fatal events.
In summary, LMNA gene mutations accounted for 33% of our cases of DCM with AVB, all of which were familial autosomal dominant DCMs. Increased sCPK levels in DCM patients without AVB were not useful in predicting LMNA mutations. The cardiac immunopathological phenotype was characterized by abnormal/defective nuclear LMNA expression and nuclear membrane disruption.
Nucleotide numbers: cDNA sequence GeneBank Accession No #M13451 (lamin C mRNA), L12399, Version GI:12399.3-6960369 (LMNA DNA exon 1), L12400 (LMNA DNA exon 2), L12401 (DNA exons 3 to 12), M13452 (lamin A, mRNA). Neutral polymorphisms found in our overall series: T995C, T1472C, C1832T (known) and C185T, G1314A (novel).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Stuurman N, Heins S, Aebi U. Nuclear lamins: their structure, assembly, and interactions. J Struct Biol. 1998;122:4266[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Fatkin D, MacRae C, Sasaki T, et al. Missense mutations in the rod domain of the lamin A/C gene as causes of dilated cardiomyopathy and conduction-system disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:17151724[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Jakobs PM, Hanson EL, Crispell KA, et al. Novel lamin A/C mutation in two families with dilated cardiomyopathy and conduction system disease. J Card Fail. 2001;7:249256[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Genschel J, Baier P, Kuepferling S, et al. A new frameshift mutation at codon 466 (1397delA) within the LMNA gene. Hum Mutat. 2000;16:278[Medline]
6. Genschel J, Bochow B, Kuepferling S, et al. An R644C mutation within lamina A extends the mutations causing dilated cardiomyopathy. Hum Mutat. 2001;17:154[Medline]
7. Brodsky GL, Muntoni F, Miocic S, Sinagra G, Sewry C, Mestroni L. Lamin A/C gene mutation associated with dilated cardiomyopathy with variable skeletal muscle involvement. Circulation. 2000;101:473476
8. Muchir A, Bonne G, van Meegen M, et al. Identification of mutations in the gene encoding lamins A/C in autosomal dominant muscular dystrophy with atrioventricular conduction disturbances (LGMD1B). Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:14531459
9. Bione S, Maestrini M, Rivella S, et al. Identification of a novel X-linked gene responsible for Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Nat Genet. 1994;8:323327[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Bione S, Small K, Aksmanovic VMA, et al. Identification of new mutations in the Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy gene and evidence for genetic heterogeneity of the disease. Hum Mol Genet. 1995;4:18591863
11. Bonne G, Raffaele di Barletta M, Varnous S, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding lamin A/C cause autosomal dominant Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Nat Genet. 1999;21:285288[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Raffaele di Barletta M, Ricci E, Galluzzi G, et al. Different mutations in the LMNA gene cause autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:14071412[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Felice KJ, Schwartz RC, Brown CA, Leicher CR, Grunnet ML. Autosomal dominant Emery-Dreifuss dystrophy due to mutations in rod domain of the lamin A/C gene. Neurology. 2000;55:275280
14. Bonne G, Merceni E, Muchir A, et al. Clinical and molecular genetic spectrum of autosomal dominant Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy due to mutation of the lamina A/C gene. Ann Neurol. 2000;48:170180[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Shackleton S, Lloyd DJ, Jackson SN, et al. LMNA, encoding lamin A/C, is mutated in partial lipodystrophy. Nat Genet. 2000;24:153156[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Cao H, Hegele RA. Nuclear lamin A/C R482Q mutation in Canadian kindreds with Dunningan-type familial partial lipodystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:109112
17. Speckman RA, Garg A, Du F, et al. Mutational and haplotype analyses of families with familial partial lipodystrophy (Dunningan variety) reveal recurrent missense mutations in the globular C-terminal domain of lamin A/C. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:11921198[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Genschel J, Schmidt HH. Mutations in the LMNA gene encoding lamin A/C. Hum Mutat. 2000;16:451459[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Cartegni L, Raffaele di Barletta M, Barresi R, et al. Heart-specific localization of emerin: new insights into Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;6:22572264
20. Gavazzi A, Repetto A, Scelsi L, et al. Evidence-based diagnosis of familial non-X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy: prevalence, inheritance and characteristics. Eur Heart J. 2001;1:7381
21. Richardson P, McKenna WJ, Bristow M, et al. Report of the 1995 World Health Organization/International Society and Federation of Cardiology Task Force on the definition and classification of cardiomyopathies. Circulation. 1996;93:841842
22. Oefner PJ, Underhill PA. DNA mutation detection using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC). Dracopoli NC, Haines JL, Korf BR, et al. Current Protocols in Human Genetics. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons; 1998. p. 7.10.17.10.12
23. Arbustini E, Grasso M, Diegoli M, et al. Expression of tumor necrosis factor in human acute cardiac rejection. Am J Pathol. 1991;139:709715[Medline]
24. Arbustini E, Diegoli M, Morbini P, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of dystrophin defects in adult male patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:17601768
25. Arbustini E, Morbini P, Grasso M, et al. Restrictive cardiomyopathy, atrioventricular block and mild to subclinical myopathy in patients with desmin-immunoreactive material deposits. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:645653
26. Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, et al. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem. 1985;150:7685[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Fidzianska A, Toniolo D, Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I. Ultrastructural abnormality of sarcolemmal nuclei in Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy (EDMD). J Neurol Sci. 1998;159:8893[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Sullivan T, Escalante-Alcade D, Bhatt H, et al. Loss of A-type lamin expression compromises nuclear envelope integrity leading to muscular dystrophy. J Cell Biol. 1999;147:913920
29. Lenz-Bohme B, Wismar J, Fuchs S, et al. Insertional mutation of the Drosophila nuclear lamin Dm0 gene results in defective nuclear envelopes, clustering of nuclear pores, and accumulation of annulate lamellae. J Cell Biol. 1997;137:10011016
30. Hutchison CJ, Alvarez-Reyes M, Vaughan OA. Lamins in disease: why do ubiquitously expressed nuclear envelope proteins give rise to tissue-specific disease phenotypes? J Cell Sci. 2001;114:919
31. Izumi M, Vaughan OA, Hutchinson CJ, Gilbert DM. Head and/or CaaX domain deletions of lamin proteins disrupt preformed lamin A and C but not lamin B structure in mammalian cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2000;11:43234337
32. Pugh GE, Coates PJ, Lane EB, Raymond Y, Quinlan RA. Distinct nuclear assembly pathways for lamins A and C lead to their increase during quiescence in Swiss 3T3 cells. J Cell Sci. 1997;110:24832493
33. Becane HM, Bonne G, Varnous S, et al. High incidence of sudden death of conduction system and myocardial disease due to lamins A/C gene mutation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23:16611666[CrossRef][Medline]